You should explore all of these things and do research
on the things the candidates want and don't want.
I think the answer is d. The slave owners could keep the slaves working in the field by turning them in because they were jobless. It was illegal back them to be jobless. The thirteenth amendment said you could not be a slave unless you were a prisoner.
If you need more help look up thirteenth amendment
In the traditional Indian caste system, the people have been divided into multiple castes. Every caste was representing a certain level of hierarchy. The people born in one caste were destined to live in that caste until the end of their lives.
The communication between the castes was very obscure. Most of the communication was going on between members of the same caste, but rarely with members of other higher or lower caste. The members of the higher castes did not communicated with the members of the lower castes because they were looking at them as lower beings, so they did not wanted to have anything with them, and it was humiliating for them to communicate with someone that is lower in the hierarchy then them.
Fortunately, the caste system has been forbid by law, so nowadays all the people are able to communicate with each other, progress in life, have opportunities, and not be discriminated against.
I believe it's "Some schools have sought to have the Supreme Court reverse its ruling in a related case with First Amendment implications, Tinker v. Des Moines."
Explanation:
The landmark January 1988 decision in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier was a giant step back for student press and speech rights. Unlike an earlier Supreme Court ruling that established the so-called Tinker Standard, the Hazelwood decision declared students do shed some of their Constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate
<span>People in both places were introduced to new crops and animals.</span>
