A. I hope this helped I am pretty sure this is the answer
There were various effects of the Civil War but one thing that was not an effect was Reduced rate of industrial production in the north.
<h3>How did the Civil War benefit the North?</h3>
The North benefitted from the Civil War because the Civil War was rarely fought on Northern soil which meant that their industries were not destroyed or damaged by war.
In fact, the North was able to increase industrial production to be able to provide their soldiers with more weapons and provisions to fight the war, thereby increasing industrial production.
Options for this question include:
- Reduced rate of industrial production in the north
- Increased rate of industrial production in the north
- Massive destruction of Southern infrastructure
Find out more on the effects of the Civil War at brainly.com/question/11470945
#SPJ1
One way in which Suleiman the Magnificent and Peter the Great are similar is that they both (1) modernized their military. However, both leaders are also associated with reformation. Peter the Great led many military campaigns in Northern Europe and Suleiman the Magnificent vastly extended the Ottoman Empire.
Answer:
1.Leif Erikson.
2.At first Columbus and Native Americans fought, but then they made peace.
3.A potato famine in Africa forced millions of starving Africans into slavery.
4.the Vikings
5.the compass
6.It allowed them to more accurately measure latitude.
Please mark me as brainliest
Explanation:
In 313 CE, the emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan, which granted Christianity—as well as most other religions—legal status. ... In 380 CE, the emperor Theodosius issued the Edict of Thessalonica, which made Christianity, specifically Nicene Christianity, the official religion of the Roman Empire.
