1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
madreJ [45]
2 years ago
13

What caused the tension between the soviet union and the us

History
1 answer:
velikii [3]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Stalin resented the Western Allie's delay in attacking the Germans in Europe and that the United States had tried to keep its development of the atomic bomb a secret.

Explanation:

Stalin always pressed England and the US to open another front during the 1940s as German forces were concentrating to deepen in the Soviet territory.

He believed the Western allies were on purpose to profit from the weakening of the USSR as it fought against Nazi Germany.

The delayed had enabled Nazis to redirect manpower to the Eastern front.

Stalin was annoyed since he believed the US and Britain delayed to open the second front against German troops in the West, and demanded a buffer formed from Baltic nations and Poland after the war.

The development of the atomic bomb was jealously held by the US, as it gave the supremacy on the overall outcome of the war and its unrevealing by alleged "spies" meant that the USSR and the US would start an arms race.

The rivalry in atomic weapons was quickly contested in the 1950s and soon to be followed by the space race.

You might be interested in
people ability to express their will varies depending on their country's form of government. how do the governments of japan, no
MissTica

The full answerisin the document attached, this is just a preview since there is a character limit.

Psragraph...

After analyzing the three states, there a lot of conclusions that can be made. First of all, these states have a division of power. There are different organs, responsible for ruling over different matters. Philippines, on one side, is a more liberal State on its formation; its constitution contains a bill of rights, belonging those to some universal principles, such as but not limited to, habeas corpus and due process. On the other hand, North Korea has division of power as well, being the Supreme People´s Assembly the legislative power, the Presidium, responsible for regulating the power and duties of the SPA, and administering Justice at a National level. People  in North Korea do have rights and liberties, for example, work, education and health are granted rights, there is freedom of speech and religion,  there are elections, and some others, but what makes a difference between this and the other states is that the basis of the exercise of these rights is collective, not individual and this can be a limitation.  

The advantages of the socialist system in North Korea is that in theory, there should not be differences between people, but most importantly, there is a spirit of modernism and transformation thru the state, that´s an interesting view and an advantage: the people, collectively will build the country, and take it to a perfect place for everyone thru science and education, which is free from kindergarten to university. But the main disadvantage is that this model is not compatible with the rest of the world and it drives the nation to isolation, because they base their model in cultural principles which are not negotiable, such as Chongsanri spirit, which in short words is a model of inspiring people to work for the nation´s sake, not for a material compensation, which in western societies might be taken as deeply unfair.

On the other hand, Japan´s model is certainly a western-like constitutional model and similar to the Philippines, being some of the advantages that Japan grants free education to all its citizens, something that does not happen in Philippines, as their bill of rights focuses on individual freedoms and those rights which regulate the relationship between the state and the individuals, for example, the right to a speedy trial or not to incriminate oneself. Japan declares peace is one of their fundamental principles and that is the reason why Japan resigned to war or to use force to solve any further conflict. This is an advantage, because for a country, resigning to war means to dedicate in other efforts for the good of their citizens.  

Type of Government...

Each country has both similarities and differences. The second ones are more related with the names of the organisms which intervene in the government process, but the main duties are quite the same. Constitutionally speaking, North Korea is not a dictatorship taking into account that everything in the country belongs to its citizens, and that people can be elected as early as 17 years old to any position in the government. But the leader represents the foundation of the country, hence the nation,  and the leader are somewhat blended, and this is the reason why this position is actually inherited, so this is certainly a dictatorship in the practice, although their Constitution says that everything belongs to everyone and that the real power are the people.

Japan is a constitutional monarchy. The Emperor represents the unity of the people, in short words, he rules only on behalf of the people, and that is actually the source of his power: people, not a divine rule as it was in the past, when he used to be the son of the sun or some kind of semi god.  He has the authority to sign regulations and decrees, for example, but there is a Prime Minister, head of the executive branch, who is the head of the government, and there is also a Supreme Court and a Diet, which has the duties of a congress, composed by two houses.

As of the Philippines, it is a democracy, a republican form of state with its power divided in three branches, in which the head of the state is the President and the judiciary is under the control of the Supreme Court and the legislative branch is in charge of the Congress and Senate.            

To what extent can the people participate in the governing process of each country?

The participation in politics is equally granted in each one of these states; in North Korea, people can be elected to local or national Assembly, that is a constitutional right, similarly as it happens in the Philippines and Japan, where the right to suffrage is granted in the Constitution. This certainly, can be undermined by different local factors, such as corruption, lack of political parties or difficulties to access to the government or influence in decisions taken.    

Classification...


had to write so much but hope this helped ;(

3 0
3 years ago
How did the farm population in the united states change between 1950 and today?
stich3 [128]
<span>The population of the farm in the united states changes between 1950 and today because it dropped from 20 million to fewer than 5 million people. The answer is letter C. Life in the farm is hard, their workload is very high but their rate of return of investment is very low. It did not help with the technology that we have nowadays, machines that can replace certain works that they have and so few of them remains.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
How do the choices of ordinary citizens impact a country's history?
PolarNik [594]

Answer:

cuz they can change da world in a good way like setting up an organization for people to donate food to families in need or helping people get transportation these are ways dat people can impact our history I hope dis helps :3

7 0
3 years ago
Identify 2 ways that new deal programs attempted to address the effects of the Great Depression
Flauer [41]

The New Deal was a series of programs and projects instituted during the Great Depression by President Franklin D. Roosevelt that aimed to restore prosperity to Americans. When Roosevelt took office in 1933, he acted gooded to stabilize the economy and provide jobs and relief to those who were suffering.

4 0
2 years ago
Background information: this passage is an excerpt from the testimony of rudolf höss, given in a war crimes trial in 1946. accor
Aliun [14]

Rudolf höss defend his actions in the court by saying that  he was just following orders. Option D is correct.

<h3>Who was Rudolf Höss?</h3>

Rudolf Höss was an officer of the German during the Nazi era.

He was the commanding officer of Auschwitz property and extinction camp for the long-lasting time. He was convicted of war crimes after Nazi Germany was defeated. In court, he defended his actions by claiming that he was simply obeying orders.

Therefore, option D is correct.

Learn more about Rudolf Höss, refer to:

brainly.com/question/3853945

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • In your opinion, which new piece of technology was the most important during WWI?
    13·1 answer
  • Santa anna fought in the battle of _____ in 1813 to help free texas from spanish rule.
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following did not have an effect of immigration in the 1800s?
    14·2 answers
  • 3 key ideas of 95 thesis??
    5·1 answer
  • What does the term "white mans burden" refer to
    8·2 answers
  • What is the name of the region where the Ottoman Empire started?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a main reason for the growth of cities and suburbs in the late 1800s and early 1900s? Question 2 opti
    10·1 answer
  • Which trait is common to both Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism?
    6·1 answer
  • Please help<br> best answer = brainlist
    7·1 answer
  • 办理教留服学位学历认证Q/微29304199 英国利兹文凭#Leeds毕业证文凭学位证书offer操办罗切斯特留信认证成绩单
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!