1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OlgaM077 [116]
3 years ago
11

Summarize the Supreme Court's historical interpretation of the Second Amendment. Identify which theory the court has generally s

upported. Cite at least one court case in your answer.
History
2 answers:
r-ruslan [8.4K]3 years ago
7 0
The second amendment is the right to bear arms 
lidiya [134]3 years ago
3 0
Historically the second amendment has always been treated as one that is used to reduce the power of the national government. Courts have generally accepted that the right to bear arms shall not be infringed upon and that any national law that prevents people from carrying and having firearms is unconstitutional. In 1939  they established that banning transport of weaponry is unconstitutional. In 2007 the supreme court established that forcing people to have disassembled weapons is also unconstitutional. They also stated that banning handguns or rifles is unconstitutional.
<span />
You might be interested in
Help!!!What is one reason why the 1907 constitution developed into a progressive document?
lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

D on edge

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
ASAP! SOS!<br> witch country defeated the Arabs in the battle of tours
Hitman42 [59]
France defeated the Arabs in the Battle of Tours
6 0
3 years ago
In the 1920s, the danger of buying stock on credit was that if the stock dropped, borrowers
Elena-2011 [213]
Could not repay loans used to buy the stock
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I way women were segregated during the progressive era
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

Answer:they couldnt vote

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
The 5th Amendment gives people on trial the right to avoid self-incrimination. Which statement is the best explanation of this i
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

essentially when people plead the fifth they arent forced to answer a question and prove themself guilty

Explanation:

"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury..."

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A patron is which of the following
    7·2 answers
  • How many us and canadian citizens live in the great lakes region?
    6·2 answers
  • What was the major cause of tension between the mexican government and texas colonists?
    10·1 answer
  • Respecting and understanding different opinions promotes (value/tolerance)​
    13·1 answer
  • 11. How did the stock market crash, the closing of the Ford Model T plant and the collapse of the farming
    12·1 answer
  • True or False: The Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that segregated schools can never be equal because segrega
    8·1 answer
  • Describe the volunteer opportunities that are available during a political campaign
    11·2 answers
  • What did Alexander the Great want to do that his father died trying?
    7·1 answer
  • Can someone help me with NOTES (not an entire essay) for an essay???? I'll give brainliest!!! PLEASE if you steal for points i w
    14·1 answer
  • O Renascimento, amplo movimento artístico, literário e científico, expandiu-se da Península Itálica por quase toda a Europa, pro
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!