1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tiny-mole [99]
4 years ago
6

Help me please (High school World History)

History
1 answer:
solong [7]4 years ago
7 0
    The Colombian Exchange brought two new worlds together. Mixing of many things, including animals, plants and bacteria, happened  because of this. During this time a disease called smallpox came abrupt. Some of the voyagers on way to New World were infected with this disease. Because they had smallpox they were able to carry it over seas and to the New World. 
    The people who were affected by smallpox had now carried the disease to these new lands. When they come into contact with the indigenous people of the land it spreads. Now, with the smallpox spread to the Native Americans, it starts to affect the Native populations. This is the cause of many Native American populations to be devastated and nearly eradicated.
    The transfer of smallpox over to the Native Americans was unintentional. The voyagers in turn would lose many allies and resources. It also starts a new home for the disease where it is able to weaken men and economy. 
You might be interested in
Why did Southern states leave the Union after Lincoln was elected president?
snow_tiger [21]

Answer:

Southern states were outraged over Lincoln's victory because they believed he would abolish slavery in the United States, and they believed that Lincoln had not won the election.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
The first Ten Amendments to the Constitution are known as
Reika [66]
The answer is the bill of rights
6 0
3 years ago
.Sometimes it is necessary to kill another human ?
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I have respect for well-meaning people who say, “it’s never right to kill.” The pacifist is a person of great bravery—but also naivety. Maybe they have had the good fortune of never experiencing anything that has forced them to question their belief. Clearly, they have never faced a force-on-force encounter, otherwise their moral stance would have resulted in them being dead.

Killing for domination, and ultimately for survival, is partly the reason why we are so successful as a species. Killing each other is part of the human experience and history has shown that mankind has always had a fascination with it.

Roman gladiatorial combat was barbaric, but it fulfilled a societal need. That need is still with us. According to US research, the average 18-year-old teenage boy has been subjected to approximately 22,000 killings of their fellow human beings on film, television and computer games. Death and combat have long been viewed as a form of entertainment. But killing is not just about people destroying each other. It can solve problems.

Would the Haitian slave rebellion of 1781 have been successful if the slaves had decided to join together as a union to demand freedom? Would their peaceful threats to withdraw their labour from the sugar cane fields unless their French owners gave in to their demands have been successful? I think not. The rebellion would have failed and even more slaves would have been killed. It would have been the only way the French could have solved the problem. We celebrate the slaves’ success now with the benefit of hindsight and regard the event as the start of abolition. Much like the fight against Hitler and fascism, the only way to win is to match the force and violence we face.

As the quote often attributed to Winston Churchill says: “You cannot reason with a tiger when your head is in its mouth.”

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
since 1930 during periods of economic recession which fiscal action has been taken by the United States government to stimulate
FrozenT [24]
Link asi que eebed pamafix aufia msos a

8 0
3 years ago
What is the radius of a circle having the circumference 22cm. Solve step by step plzz​
Zolol [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

let radius of a circle be x

circumference=2πr

22=2*3.14*r

22=6.28*r

22/6.28=r

3.50=r

3.6=r

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is it true that the us didnt keep their promisr to south vietnam during the vietnam war?
    10·1 answer
  • Why do we not know if any dynasties preceded the Shang?
    5·2 answers
  • What Are Some Of The Chinese Characteristics?
    15·1 answer
  • What was the main reason the cold war started
    11·1 answer
  • American policy in Vietnam has been compared to stepping into quicksand. You have been asked to give a speech on how the U.S. be
    15·1 answer
  • What is not from the bill of rights {a, the powers not delegated to the US by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the stat
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a challenge in both rural and urban areas of Mexico?
    15·1 answer
  • Explain the geographic setting and its impact of the Ancient Middle East (Mesopotamia).
    12·1 answer
  • People who hopped trains to look for work were known as...........
    11·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer. Tim gave his house in another city to his sister. He had to pay taxes to the government on this trans
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!