1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slamgirl [31]
4 years ago
14

What minimum distance must be maintained from a u.s. navy boat?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Sever21 [200]4 years ago
5 0
The minimum distance that <span>must be maintained from a u.s. navy boat is: 100 yards
U.S navy boats have to keep themselves under siege to prevent potential attacks from the sea. If you're traveling to close to the U.S navy boat, they may misjudge you as a threat to the ships and could take unwanted action</span>
You might be interested in
HELP WANTED PLZZZ
mel-nik [20]
I’d say South Korea because most of the country is the same ethnicity, practices the same religion, and speaks the same language.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What statement is supported by the chart above?a
pochemuha

If you want us to see the chart, you have to add an image file.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were so many Bedouins against Muhammad's preaching?
spin [16.1K]
Muhammad’s message of monotheism does not adequately explain why the leaders of the Quraysh rejected his message so forcefully. Indeed, Muhammad preached a lot more than this: he called for a top-to-bottom reform of Meccan society, advocating for the rights of the poor and weak. While it is also true that Muhammad’s renouncement of the pagan gods was unbearable to many followers of the old religion, so too did his powerful critique of the rich and powerful set him on a collision course against them.
6 0
3 years ago
Please write an essay discussing whether and how a) the act of voting is the personal responsibility of every citizen, and b) ci
Delvig [45]

Voting: A Right, A Privilege, or A Responsibility?

When Americans talk about their democracy, they typically emphasize the importance of the right to vote. But the fact is that, unlike other democratic rights protected in the First Amendment, voting rights do not have clear constitutional protections. State legislatures have the right to appoint electors in presidential races without holding elections, for example, and states can enact a variety of policies that directly or indirectly infringe on suffrage rights. While strengthening voting rights in the Constitution would seem like a logical step, there's a potential political barrier: confusion about the meaning of "right."  

This essay invites readers to question whether the ability to vote should be a right, a privilege, or a responsibility. For the ease of readership, I will define the necessary terms:  

  • Privilege (n): An immunity or benefit enjoyed only by a person beyond the advantaged of most.
  • Right (n): That which is due to anyone by just claim, legal guarantees, or moral principles.
  • Responsibility (n): Being answerable or accountable for something within one's power, control, or management.

At first glance, it's easy to view these terms as mutually exclusive. From their definitions, we can see that what is a "privilege" cannot be a right since rights are enjoyed by everyone, while a privilege is reserved for a select group. Likewise, it's impossible for an individual to take on the burden of responsibility if they lack to the right to vote in the first place.

Despite this initial judgment, many people view the ability to vote as all three simultaneously and weigh "right" after "privilege" or "responsibility." For example, many believe the ability to vote is a privilege granted to today's eligible voters by those who fought for it in the past either through war, grassroots movements, or legislative battles. These struggles have kept the United States as an independent nation and granted us the right to vote with the passage of the 15th, 19th, 24th, and 26th amendment, in addition to the legislative victory of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. From this perspective, it is a privilege to live in the United States, standing on the shoulders of these past giants, and we have a responsibility to vote because it honors those who have put their lives on the line to protect it.

Indeed a study conducted in 2006 by Peter D. Hart Research Associates found far most participants in a series of focus groups saw voting as a responsibility or a privilege more than as a right. Many categorized voting primarily as a privilege because previous generations had fought for it and other countries don't enjoy the same freedom. The plurality of participants saw it primarily as a responsibility because it highlights the importance of choosing the government. Many of these participants chose not to classify it primarily as a "right" because the word "right" suggested to them a sense of entitlement.

Many participants also believed that fraud was a bigger problem than disenfranchisement. Although these beliefs are not based in reality (proven cases of voter fraud are miniscule compared to clear cases of denial of suffrage), they say something very important about the general mindset of American voters. When it comes to voting, "right" is a dangerous word since it suggests the ability to vote has simply been given to you without a fight -- and things that can make voting harder but prevent fraud like voter registration laws, requirements for photo identification and inconvenient polling places are minor compared to the sacrifices of past generations. In this mindset, anyone who might not vote due to such barriers is not accepting responsibility for how important it is and not recognizing what a privilege it is to have the right to vote.

As is obvious from the Peter Hart study, a common misconception is the word "right" denoting a sense of entitlement. People who hold this view shy away from considering the ability to vote a right because it suggests it has simply been given to us without historical struggles, thereby demeaning the individuals who have laid their lives on the line to forge and preserve our freedoms.

7 0
3 years ago
The act of _____ completes the transaction between the speaker and the audience member.
finlep [7]
The correct answer is listening. It is because listening is involve between the speaker and the audience member in which as the speaker speaks about what he or she would like to share, the role of the audience member is to listen to the speaker and by this, they are likely to fulfill and complete both of the parties' transaction.
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • David is a small business owner who thinks it is more important to spend money on marketing his current product line than to inv
    10·1 answer
  • Which front is not a standard weather frontWhich front is not a standard weather front?Select one of the options below as your a
    12·1 answer
  • How many people tour the volcano, Mauna Loa in Hawaii?
    9·1 answer
  • Donald is very familiar with the poem that begins "'Twas the Night Before Christmas." However, he cannot recall the names of all
    8·1 answer
  • ndrew experiences physical pain and mental stress related to his disease. He practices yoga and meditation to help him deal with
    10·1 answer
  • What website can I use to find the answers to the BrainPop Activity Worksheet for Parlimentry Systems?
    15·1 answer
  • Can you answer thank you
    5·2 answers
  • Who were the three main gods of Hinduism?
    8·2 answers
  • Is the United Kingdom majorly Conservative or Liberal?.
    7·1 answer
  • video game improves behavioral outcomes in adolescents and young adults with cancer: a randomized tria
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!