There are different kinds of persons and one type is composed of those who work well alone while other would prefer to work in the group. If the group is large enough so that it is just conducive for learning then, it will be helpful to the dynamics. However, if it is very big that it is no longer healthy then, it would be better to divide further the group.
If the story were to continue, the author would mostly likely discuss, the way the author and Uncle Jake escaped from the bison herd.
Answer: Option B.
Explanation:
The above given excerpt provides details about how the author used to spend his vacation at his uncle's place and the things he used to do over there. As the story moves forward, we come across an incident where the author and uncle Jack have encountered a group of bison. The bisons were coming near them, they were frightened and confused as to what should be done now, and that's when the story ended. So the continued part of the story would most certainly be, how Uncle Jack and the author have escaped the bison herd.
I believe that's informal writing.
<span>1)the prevailing feeling or emotion of a literary work; also called “atmosphere”
</span>A-Mood
<span>The mood of a story describes its general vibe
2)descriptive language that relies on sensory details to help readers imagine the setting, characters, and details of a story or a poem
</span>D-Imagery
<span>
3)the time, the place, and the social and historical conditions in which a literary work occurs </span>
E-Setting
<span>The setting includes the where and when of a story
4)a classification of literature characterized by particular content and form
</span>C-Genre
<span>Genres include comedy, romance, and science-fiction
5)the primary character in a literary work, often considered the hero or the moral character </span>
F-Protagonist
The protagonist is the main character of the story, and generally the one you're supposed to sympathize with.
6)a character whose perspective of reality is biased and/or distorted
B-unreliable narrator
You don't know if you can believe everything an unreliable narrator says, due to the established idea that he is dishonest, biased, or not totally sane
