The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Hence, the correct statement is option C.
<h3>What happened in the case of Wainwright and Arizona?</h3>
In this case, the Supreme Court declared that the Fourteenth Amendment creates a right for criminal defendants who cannot pay for their own lawyers to have state-appointed attorneys on their behalf.
The missing information is given below:
A. Baker v. Carr (1962) and Engel v. Vitale (1962)
B. Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) and Roe v. Wade (1973)
C. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
D. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) and Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)
Hence, The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). the correct statement is option C.
learn more about case of Wainwright and Arizona:
brainly.com/question/10320938
#SPJ1
The correct answer is A. To prevent discrimination against voters based on race.
The fifteenth amendment which is found in united states, it prohibits each state and federal government from not allowing citizen right to vote.
This amendment was passed in order to provide citizenship, abolish slavery, and under laws there is equal protection,
The amendment created women's suffrage movement which did not prohibit the denial of women right to vote on sex account.
Answer:
Sorry but I already have one ;-;
Explanation:
This grew out of his strategy for unifying his empire by creating a “catholic” meaning <span>universal </span>church that would blend elements from many religions into one.
