1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
barxatty [35]
3 years ago
5

Henry viii asks the pope to annul his marriage cause and effect

History
2 answers:
Vinil7 [7]3 years ago
4 0

<em><u>Political Causes </u></em>

  • Henry VIII was married to Catherine of Aragon, who was aunt of Charles V, King of Spain.
  • England participated in support of Spain in its war against France.
  • The English people considered that the alliance with Spain was unsuccessful because this involved paying high taxes requested by Cardinal Wolsey intended to support the war against France and the clergy of the Church.
  • When Spain managed to defeat the Army of Francisco I, King of France, the English crown decided to break the pact with Spain.

<em><u>Personal causes </u></em>

  • Henry VIII wanted a son to be his heir to the throne, which he had not yet achieved with Catherine.
  • He fell in love with Ana Bolena, who was Catalina's maid.
  • To be able to marry Ana, she had to separate from Catalina.

<em><u>Event</u></em>

Henry VIII asked to annul his marriage to Pope Clement VII, who after a long time extended a formal decision not to grant the annulment of the marriage.


<em><u>Consequences </u></em>

  • Henry VIII removed Cardinal Wolsey from office and placed Cardinal Cromwell in his charge.
  • The King established marital life with Ana Bolena and later Cardinal Cromwell declared the marriage annulment with Catalina.
  • This was worth the King was excommunicated from the Roman Catholic Church.
  • The King decided to establish the Anglican Church as a new religion in England of which he would be  head.
  • Immediately afterwards the King decreed the dissolution of the Monasteries and the confiscation of Catholic property.
  • There were many people who resisted the new ecclesiastical situation and some referents like Tomás Moro were executed.
  • The majority of the people accepted the situation because the tax pressure was removed.

<em><u>Conclusion </u></em>

Henry VIII solved political and personal causes and secondarily created the Anglican Church, which continues to this day.









creativ13 [48]3 years ago
3 0

Henry viii asks the pope to annul his marriage to Catherine of Aragon because she was his brother's widow and that why she could not yield him a son. Henry justified his request for a marriage annulment by using an Old Testament text  from Leviticus Chapter 20 Verse 16 which states; “If a man shall take his brother’s wife, it is impurity; he hath uncovered his brother’s nakedness; they shall be childless.”

The pope's refusal to nullify Henry's marriage resulted in the withdrawal of England from the Catholic Church and creation of the Church of England( Anglican church).

You might be interested in
The fictional country of kovasia decides to open its market to foreign businesses. what positive and negative effects will kovas
melisa1 [442]

The positive effects helps the growth of Kosavia with the increase of less expensive export, and the negative effects involve the loss of job and the less popularity of the domestic product.

<h3 /><h3>What is foreign business?</h3>

Foreign business has been defined as the trade between the nation the earning the profit by the countries.

Kosavia with the foreign trade may experience the following as the positive effect that helps it to increase its capital:

  • The volume of exports will increase
  • Goods and services may become less expensive.

The foreign business of Kosavia will experience the following  negative effects:

  • Domestic products may become less popular
  • People may lose jobs to outsourcing

Learn more about foreign business, here:

brainly.com/question/17256785

7 0
2 years ago
How can indirect lobbying be influential
Rom4ik [11]
<span>Direct face-to-face lobbying is "the gold standard" of lobbying. Everything else is done to support the basic form. Face-to-face lobbying is considered to be the most effective because it allows the interest to directly communicate its concerns, needs, and demands directly to those who possess the power to do something politically. The lobbyist and the public official exist in a mutually symbiotic relationship. Each has something the other desperately needs. The interest seeks governmental assistance and the public official seeks political support for future elections or political issue campaigns. The environment for such lobbying discussions is usually the spaces outside the legislative chambers or perhaps the offices of the legislators. The legislative arena has characteristics that facilitate the lobbying process. It is complex and chaotic. Out of the thousands of bills that might be introduced in a legislative session, sometimes fewer than a hundred are actually passed. There is never enough time to complete the work on the agenda—not even a fraction of the work. The political process tends to be a winner-takes-all game—often a zero-sum game given the limited resources available and seemingly endless lists of demands that request some allocation of resources. Everyone in the process desperately needs information and the most frequent (and most useful) source of information is the lobbyist. The exchange is simple: the lobbyist helps out the governmental officials by providing them with information and the government official reciprocates by helping the interests gain their objectives. There is a cycle of every governmental decision-making site. At crucial times in those cycles, the needs of the officials or the lobbyists may dominate. For lobbyists in a legislative site, the crucial moments are as the session goes down to its final hours. For legislators, the closer they are to the next election, the more responsive they are to lobbyists who possess resources that may help.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Who were the first settlers of New Hampshire?
Kruka [31]

Answer:

New Hampshire was first settled by Europeans at Odiorne's Point in Rye (near Portsmouth) by a group of fishermen from England under David Thompson in 1623, just three years after the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Americans react to the report by the Nye Committee in 1934?
Anarel [89]
A I searched on google
5 0
3 years ago
To__ is to make fun of a serious piece of writing
tester [92]
To mock or to parody
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Because the Crusades opened travel to the East and brought back new goods, Western Europe experienced a growth in .
    11·2 answers
  • What was MacArthur’s role in the Korean War?
    12·1 answer
  • What are the three basic beliefs of Christianity?
    13·1 answer
  • Who was the second president?
    6·2 answers
  • During the 1920s,what was one result of innovations in U.S. transportation technology?
    14·1 answer
  • How does migration affect cultures and society
    9·1 answer
  • What happened at the battle of the Somme. Explain in great detail and the amount of casualties during the battle.
    11·2 answers
  • Help please lol if I fail this I fail
    6·1 answer
  • Which of type of person was most likely to be a Democratic Republican?
    10·1 answer
  • Why were the Articles of Confederation replaced with the Constitution?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!