Hello There!
People do tend to get these mixed up.
The protagonist is Rainsford.
The antagonist is General Zaroff.
Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck :)
- Hannah ❤
<em>“The inflated style itself is a kind of euphemism. A mass of Latin words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outline and covering up all the details. The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one’s real and one’s declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink. In our age there is no such thing as ‘keeping out of politics.’ All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred, and schizophrenia. When the general atmosphere is bad, language must suffer. I should expect to find — this is a guess which I have not sufficient knowledge to verify — that the German, Russian and Italian languages have all deteriorated in the last ten or fifteen years, as a result of dictatorship.”</em>
Answer:
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Answer:
B). Instead
Explanation:
As per the question, the most appropriate word to complete the given sentence would be 'instead.' Thus, the complete sentence reads as:
'Instead, the constitution breaks the U.S. Government into three branches.'
<u>It offers a complete and accomplished meaning. It implies that 'in comparison to the present two branches of the federal government, the constitution instead divides the United States Govt. three equal yet independent branches</u>.' The other word fails to go as per the context of the sentence and convey an incomplete thought as they either include a subordinating conjunction('although', 'before') or require contextual background(as 'in conclusion'). Thus, <u>option</u> <u>B</u> is the correct answer.
