Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is true that this is an example of a positivistic explanation of criminal behaviour. Positivistic explanations focus on the connection between criminal behaviour and external factors. These theories argue that criminal behaviour is often due to social, political or economic circumstances that put pressure on a person and encourage him or her to act in a deviant way. Sam would be a good example of this theory, as he encountered many problems in his life that might have encouraged him to act in a criminal way.
In 1898, prior to the Spanish American war, The Teller Amendment<span> was passed. This amendment prevented the annexation of Cuba by United States forces, and placed a condition on the United States' military presence in Cuba. Therefore, the Teller Amendment would be violates if the US were to annex Cuba following a conflict.</span>
I believe the answer is: <span>enough statistical support for the research hypothesis when there is not
In statistic terms, a type I error refers to the occurrence of "false positive" findings.
A false positive often happen when we do not have enough subjects which make us believe the data that we took from a small sample represent the true condition outside the research.</span><span />
