The income elasticity of real money demand d. 3/4
Increase in real money demand = Increase in nominal money demand - Increase in inflation = 4% - 1% = 3%
Income elasticity of real money demand = % increase in real money demand / % increase in real income
= 3% / 4%
= 3/4
Income elasticity of demand is a monetary measure of how responsive the amount of demand for a very good or provider is to trade-in earnings. The formulation for calculating earnings elasticity of demand is the percentage change in quantity demanded divided by using the percent change in earnings.
In economics, the profits elasticity of call for is the responsivenesses of the quantity demanded an amazing to an alternate in patron profits. It is measured because of the ratio of the share exchange in the amount demanded to the proportion exchange in profits.
If the earnings elasticity of call for is more than 1, the best or carrier is taken into consideration a luxury and profits elastic. An amazing provider that has an earnings elasticity of call for between zero and 1 is considered an ordinary correct and income inelastic.
Learn more about Income elasticity here: brainly.com/question/15899715
#SPJ4
Answer:
A. Education, savings, and human capital, respectively.
Answer:
The cost of the work transferred-out during May is $18,630
Explanation:
For computing the cost of work transferred, first we have to compute the conversion cost per unit and material cost per unit
The conversion cost per uni = Conversion cost ÷ (transferred units + work in progress)
= $11,160 ÷ (2,700 + 300 × 30%)
= $11,160 ÷ (2,700 + 90)
= $11,160 ÷ 2,790
= $4 per unit
Now, material cost per unit = Material cost ÷ (transferred units + work in progress)
= $8,700 ÷ (2,700+300)
= $8700 ÷ 3,000
= $2.9 per unit
So, total cost of the work transferred is equals to
= Transferred units × conversion cost per unit + transferred units × material cost per unit
= 2,700 × $4 + 2,700 × $2.9
= $10,800 + $7,830
= $18,630
Hence, the cost of the work transferred-out during May is $18,630
Answer:
Ten pounds of chicken to trade for at least <u>40</u> pounds of vegetables but not more than<u> 50</u> pounds of vegetables
Explanation:
Vegetables Chicken Trade Off Ratio
John 40 10 4:1 (40/10) or 1:0.25 (10/40)
George 25 5 5:1 (25/5) or 1:0.20 (5/25)
John has comparative advantage in Chicken and George has comparative advantage in Veggies because :
- John's chicken opportunity cost, in veggies < George (4<5). George's veggies opportunity cost, in chicken < John (0.20<0.25).
- George is more (5X) productive in veggies than chicken, than John (4X). John is less unproductive in chicken than veggies (1/4th), compared to George (1/5th).
So, John will sell Chicken to George & George will sell veggies to John. Gains from trade are when each get trade ratio better than their their own trade off ratio.
- It implies: John gets >' 4 pounds veggies per chicken pound' and George gets > '0.20 pound chicken per veggie pound'.
- Unitary method:- '1chicken : 4veggies' = '10chickens : 40veggies' and '0.20chicken : 1veggie' = '10chickens : 50 veggies' .
Answer:
Company 1 is most likely to have lost sales due to an inventory shortage.
Explanation:
Inventory turnover is the ratio that how many time a business has sold or replaced the inventory during a given period. A business is considered more profitable if it has high inventory turnover.
Company with highest Inventory turnover may lost sales due to inventory shortage. Company 1 1 has the highest inventory turnover of 46.3. Which may lead to to the shortage of stock because the inventory in stock is more likely to sold earlier than other companies. High inventory turnover will lead to low inventory days.