Answer:
The only safe generalization one can make on the subject is that it is common for today's candidates to ach was a fairly close election between the top two candidate
Explanation:
Answer:
1. It made a Unilateral mistake
2. It cannot be voided by the cruise line
Explanation:
This cruise line has made a Unilateral mistake in this scenario.
In terms of the law, this cruise line does not have the power to void the transaction on its own accord in the normal course of business. but it has the right to plea in a law court that it did this business transaction sale based on non availability of complete price quote and also that there was a unilateral mistake of facts. It will also have to make a case that the sale was caused by the buyer who tried to benefit from the mistake through misrepresentation and omissions.
The court would then decide on the case at it own discretion.
Answer:
Pearson v. Callahan
Explanation:
This was a case that was decided by the United States which would deal with the doctrine of qualified immunity.
Hope this Helps!
Answer:
B
Explanation:
This person that is called on to testify during a trial must have the knowledge or skills in the field that is relevant to the case. A psychologist may be asked to serve as a consultant to an attorney or to a testifying psychologist. This can be used to determine if someone is being truthful or if they are being deceitful. They can be appointed by the court and they can sort through claims that are conflicting or if a conclusion cannot be reached. He is there to express his opinion based on his knowledge and education.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
I think that their punishment should be harsher because they are expected to do the right thing in the positions that are given to them so if they disobey they should be punish severely because they are not above the law.
