An Turkles argument speaks to the superiority of face to face conversations over technology-aided or enabled communication such as emails and texting.
Turkle indeed alludes to the advantages given by the use of technology such as email and texting services etc to modify our conversation/message to perfection.
In her opinion, this is at best superficial in the long run and does not replace the good old fashion face to face (albeit "imperfect") mode of communication which allows for deeper connections that technology can ever allow.
She notes in paragraph 11 that Human relationships are worth a bundle, complicated and challenging. She indicates that humans have acquired the habit of using technology to make these interactions seem "flawless". According to Turkle, this shifting behaviour towards a perfect representation of self has only reduced conversation to electronic connections and that this has devalued the worth of human interactions which whose real benefit is in connecting with one another.
According to her, online connections don't present a substitute for real conversations Explanation:
The information you need to know regarding daytime sits is provided here.
No matter what you do, spending a lot of time sitting up increases your risk of illness and early mortality. Regardless of how often a person exercises, the amount of time they spend sitting down during the day is associated to a higher risk of developing heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and mortality.
The amount of time a person spends sitting during the day is associated with an increased risk of heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and mortality, even if they regularly exercise.
Overseeing the experiment was Dr. David Alter, a senior scientist at the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute. He said that more than half of the average person's day is spent sitting, watching television, or using a computer.
to learn about sits during the day from the link.
brainly.com/question/28502492
#SPJ9
Answer:
in the opening paragraph
Explanation:
Hope this helped. Please give branliest.
Answer:
It has expanded our life expectancy and nature of living. Where it has brought people closer in various ways, it has also contributed towards drifting people apart from each other. Without it, our lives would have been less difficult, harder, poorer, secluded, unoriginal, disengaged and perilous.
The ANSWER is A. hope this helps
<span />
