I think that the answer would be A because it doesn’t say anything about the president or justices/judicial court. Hope this helps!
Option A
Cherokee group of North Georgia Indians was forcibly removed from its land after gold was discovered there
<u>Explanation:</u>
U.S. delegations, provoked by the state of Georgia, ousted the Cherokee Indians from their maternal motherland in the Southeast and transferred them to the Indian Region. The extraction of the Cherokees was an outcome of the need for the arable area through the widespread germination of renting in the Southeast, the invention of gold on Cherokee land.
Notwithstanding these works, white characters in Georgia and other southern states that adjoined the Cherokee Nation denied to believe the Cherokee people as cultural peers and pushed their political delegates to clinch the Cherokees' land.
I think that is it safe to say (I mean by this: check if it's among your options) that both individual and international trade are voluntary exchange of goods -both parties have to agree on it without being forced to it. Also they should be mutually beneficial - otherwise the two parties would have have agreed!
