Answer: Not necessarily: The debt ratios are not directly comparable, since each company is in a different industry.
Explanation:
We cannot authoritatively state that even though Boeing has such a high debt rate, that it is a riskier company than either Microsoft or PG&E. This is due to the drawback in ratio analysis of bias if compared across different industries.
Ratio analysis best works when comparing companies in the same industry because their situations will be similar. Comparing across industries can be misleading because different industries operate in different ways. In the Airplane manufacturing business for instance, having a high amount of debt due to having the tangible assets to back it up might be a normal thing.
The debt ratios are therefore not directly comparable because each company is in a different industry.
Answer:
c $11,600
Explanation:
At 4,000 units the unit cost for the fixed manufacturing overhead is 2.90 dollars
We multiply it by 4,000 to know the total amount
$2.90 x 4,000 units = $ 11,600
These will be fixed cost thus, will not change when we produce between the relevant rage of 2,500 to 5,500 units
Answer:
comparison and contrast
Explanation: the definitation and meaning is expained in speech chapter 12
It is false that regulatory and basal transcription factors regulate transcription by binding to the promoter.
Answer:
P0 = $43.96935449 rounded off to $43.97
Explanation:
Using the dividend discount model, we can calculate the price of the stock today. The DDM values a stock based on the present value of the expected future dividends from the stock. The formula to calculate the price of the stock today is,
P0 = D1 / (1+r) + D2 / (1+r)^2 + ... + Dn / (1+r)^n + [(Dn * (1+g) / (r - g)) / (1+r)^n]
Where,
- g is the constant growth rate
- r is the required rate of return
P0 = 2 / (1+0.14) + 1.5 / (1+0.14)^2 + 2.5 / (1+0.14)^3 + 3.5 / (1+0.14)^4 +
[(3.5 * (1+0.08) / (0.14 - 0.08)) / (1+0.14)^4]
P0 = $43.96935449 rounded off to $43.97
