Answer:
One possible confound for the experiment is the attitude of the research assistants.
Step-by-step explanation:
A confounder simply means a variable that has impact in influencing both the dependent variable and independent variable, causing a spurious association.
So, we can conclude that the attitudes of the research assistants have positive and negative impacts in determining the reactions of both participants in the experiment.
The rudeness of a research assistant will negatively impact the response of the participant allocated to him/her.
The calmness of the other research assistant will positively impact the response of the participant allocated to him/her.
The Blue Devils are trying to sell us a bridge and a bill of goods.
But we are sharp, and we are not falling for their story.
We are smart enough to spot two glaring weaknesses in their story.
1). There is no way to win .5 of a game.
2). There is no way to win 37 games if you've
only played 24 so far.
Essentially, what we need to do here is prove that BE=EC, BE=CB, and.or CE=BC therefore making it isosceles. With ∠AEC=∠DEB, we know AE=DE, so EC=EB (the points go in order). Therefore, as EC=EB, BEC is isosceles (it has at least 2 equal sides).
Feel free to ask further questions!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
8.5*7.5 = 63.75
Answer:
(2, 10)
Step-by-step explanation:
Making the points on a graph and creating a line between them, you can see the equation to connect the two points is -3x + 16. Then, because the points are 5 units apart horizontally, go to the point that is 4 units left of point T (1/4 of the way between T and S) and that is your point: (2, 10)
I apologize if this is incorrect :)
