Answer:
a. longitudinal
Explanation:
A longitudinal study examines a given group over a long period of time, so collecting data from the same group of 30 people over their lifetime certainly fits that definition. It's more like an evolution study.
A cross-sectional compares different groups at the same point in time. So, it's more like a survey.
A microgenetic is much focused in time, providing multiple data sets in a short time to examine rapid evolution of a subject.
An experimental study design will make interactions and experiments with the study group, while this is not the case here apparently, and experimental is usually for a much shorter period than a generation.
The probability of the teenager owning a skateboard or a bicycle will be 0.46 or 46%. And the events are mutually exclusive.
<h3>What is the
addition rule of size for two subsets?</h3>
For two subsets A and B of the universal set U, we have:
P(A ∪ B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A ∩ B)
The probability of a new york teenager owning a skateboard is 0.37, of owning a bicycle is 0.36, and of owning both is 0.27.
Then the probability of the teenager owning a skateboard or a bicycle will be
P(A ∪ B) = 0.37 + 0.36 - 0.27
P(A ∪ B) = 0.73 - 0.27
P(A ∪ B) = 0.46
Thus, the probability of the teenager owning a skateboard or a bicycle will be 0.46 or 46%.
The events are mutually exclusive.
Learn more about the addition rule for two subsets here:
brainly.com/question/27496136
#SPJ4
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
The green houses gases concentration increases in the the troposphere layer of the atmosphere due to which the sunrays (IR radiation) reflected back by earth are restricted by the green house gases thereby increasing the temperature of the earth and make the climate warmer.
Hence, option A is correct
Answer:
i think it’s d, but i’m not sure.
Explanation:
Answer: Look at the explanation.
Explanation: An environmental consequence could be our land. The more land we use for agriculture results in loss of biodiversity. Slash-and-burn kills many trees and plant life. These trees are home to many small animals and now they are homeless and will die unless they adapt and find a new land. A social consequence could be food deserts. Food deserts are caused by and increase poverty and starvation. Nonexistent stores in rural areas do not help the population. People starve and barely have another way of getting healthy food. They rely on fast food chains which do not help with health.
