That is true. Is there a specific question you have about it?
<span>First
thing you need to know is that Bollywood is the name used by some
people for Bombay(Mumbai) film industry. Bombay film industry deals with
Hindi films. There are several film industries in India. All these
industries combines to make Indian Film Industry the largest in the
World. Other popular film industries in India are Tamil, Malayalam,
Telugu, Kannada, Bhojpuri etc.
There is not a fixed subject in Bollywood. There are varieties in
themes. For example the recent Oscar entry from India Taare Zameen Par
was about a 8 year old who suffers greatly until a teacher identifies
him as dyslexic. Also another Huge hit of 2008 'Rock On' is the first
Indian film to deal with the Rock Music category.
The recent trends Indicate that Bollywood is favoring stories that
seems real. This is further confirmed by the success of 'Aamir', 'A
Wednesday', 'Mumbai Meri Jaan' etc. Also the action movies had a huge
revival after the success of John Abraham starrer 'Dhoom'. Many horror
films are also in the making following the huge success of '1920',
'Phoonk', 'Raaz 2 - The mystery Continues' etc.
Also 'Love' play an important part of Bollywood films. But that doesn't mean that every film is a love story.
Another important feature of Bollywood from other film industries are
the songs in the film. Most songs are visually rich with different
costumes & locations.
I hope that I have covered everything you needed to know. </span>
17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Direct Election of U.S. Senators (1913)
The Constitution, as it was adopted in 1788, made the Senate an assembly where the states would have equal representation. Each state legislature would elect two senators to 6-year terms. Late in the 19th century, some state legislatures deadlocked over the election of a senator when different parties controlled different houses, and Senate vacancies could last months or years. In other cases, special interests or political machines gained control over the state legislature. Progressive reformers dismissed individuals elected by such legislatures as puppets and the Senate as a "millionaire’s club" serving powerful private interests.
One Progressive response to these concerns was the "Oregon system," which utilized a state primary election to identify the voters’ choice for Senator while pledging all candidates for the state legislature to honor the primary’s result. Over half of the states adopted the "Oregon system," but the 1912 Senate investigation of bribery and corruption in the election of Illinois Senator William Lorimer indicated that only a constitutional amendment mandating the direct election of Senators by a state’s citizenry would allay public demands for reform.
When the House passed proposed amendments for the direct election of Senators in 1910 and 1911, they included a "race rider" meant to bar Federal intervention in cases of racial discrimination among voters. This would be done by vesting complete control of Senate elections in state governments. A substitute amendment by Senator Joseph L. Bristow of Kansas provided for the direct election of Senators without the "race rider." It was adopted by the Senate on a close vote before the proposed constitutional amendment itself passed the Senate. Over a year later, the House accepted the change, and on April 8, 1913, the resolution became the 17th amendment.
<span>The public ignored their rulings and their regulations. It was hard for everyone to agree on any one course of action.
</span>
This is a complex issue, but the main reason why the cherokees were forced to move even though the supreme court ruled in their favor was because states ignored the court.
