Answer:
c. the exaggerated hockey stick
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the business plan error that Nan is incurring is the exaggerated hockey stick. In the context a business, "a hockey stick" explains a startups growth as a linear steady growth at launch until it hits a certain tipping point and has a growth explosion. It seems though, that in this scenario Nan is exaggerating the initial growth aspect of the startup as saying that they can capture 40% of the market, which is an extremely high value.
Answer:
The journal entries alongwith its explanation are as under:
Explanation:
Journal entry at Jan 3, to record purchase of treasury stock would include the recording of treasury stock at the price paid to the shareholders for purchase of the stock, the journal entry is as under:
Dr Treasury Stock (1800 share*$8 per share) $14,400
Cr Cash $14,400
Journal entry at Jan 30, of selling treasury stock would include the elimination of the treasury stock at the amount purchased and the remainder will will be the Paid-In Capital, the journal entry is as under:
Dr Cash (1200*9) $10,800
Cr Treasury stock (1200*8) $9,600
Cr Paid in capital from sale of treasury stock $1,200
Answer: False
Explanation:
The statement that "BMW and United Airlines cannot be considered in the same industry analysis because they compete in different industries" is wrong.
It should be noted that both of them are in the mobility industry. The mobility industry refers to the industry which covers the broad range of the organisations which provide products and services thar are used to support domestic and international relocations and assignments.
Answer and Explanation:
a. Here it is reasonable to presume that the treasury bond generates high returns when there is a recession.
b. The calculation of the expected rate of return and the standard deviation for each investment is shown below:
For stocks
= (Expected return of the boom × weightage of boom) + (expected return of the normal economy × weightage of normal economy) + (expected return of the recession × weightage of recession)
= (29% × 0.30) + (18% × 0.50) + (-4% × 0.20)
= 8.7% + 9% - 0.80%
= 16.9%
For bonds
= (Expected return of the boom × weightage of boom) + (expected return of the normal economy × weightage of normal economy) + (expected return of the recession × weightage of recession)
= (6% × 0.30) + (9% × 0.50) + (16% × 0.20)
= 1.8% + 4.5% + 3.2%
= 9.5%
Now the standard deviation calculation is to be shown in the excel spreadsheet
For the stock it is 11.48%
And, for the bond it is 3.5%
c. The investment that should be prefer could be computed by determine the coefficient of variation which is shown below:
Formula i.e. used is
= Standard deviation ÷ expected return
For stock, it is
= 16.9% ÷ 11.48%
= 1.47
And, for bonds it is
= 9.5% ÷ 3.5%
= 2.71
Since for the bonds the coefficient of variation is greater so the same is to be considered
Therefore the bond should be prefer
Answer:
Of course Jo-Anne Roberts can keep the apartment.
Explanation:
Jo-Anne and the previous owner of the apartment had a valid contract by which Jo-Anne was to pay $3.7 million for the apartment. She has already partially completed her performance on the contract, so the seller must perform his part of the contract.
