1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anit [1.1K]
4 years ago
8

In the opening pages of the feminine mystique, betty friedan wrote about a problem that "lay buried, unspoken, for many years in

the minds of american women." what was this problem?
History
1 answer:
omeli [17]4 years ago
6 0
That women were unfulfilled and unhappy in the limited role American society assigned to them.

Betty Friedan was an early leader of the feminist movement in the United States.  Her important book, <em>The Feminine Mystique, </em>published in 1963, argued that women in America were being misled into an unfulfilling and unhappy way of life.  They were made to believe that fulfillment and happiness as a woman came from being a wife, mother, homemaker.  But Friedan's studies of women showed that women were not happy just from that, that they were hungering for something else.  Their whole identity was coming from their roles or relationships to others in the home, not from who they actually were themselves.
Friedan's book challenged the existing patterns that existed in American society and pushed for women to have more of their own value for their own sake.  As she said (in chapter one):  "We can no longer ignore the voice within women that says, 'I want something more than my husband and my children and my home.'"
You might be interested in
All the following were effects of the Panic of 1983 except?
SashulF [63]

I AHVE NO CLUE WHAT THAT IS

3 0
3 years ago
Where did the capital move to in the year 781?
Monica [59]

Answer:

the capital moved to the Potomac River

Explanation:

i have no explanation

8 0
3 years ago
Is it more accurate to say that the Texas governor is the state’s “chief persuader” than to say that he or she is the “chief exe
SCORPION-xisa [38]
Add me on ig BhadBharbhie_2020
8 0
3 years ago
Under Japan's new system of feudalism, the daimyo were
Stolb23 [73]
Held captaive as slaves
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What four things should you look for when analyzing sources in history?
skad [1K]

When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources--whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies--that people from that period left behind.

Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.

In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:

1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?

2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author's message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?

3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?

4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?

5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person's eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?

6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author's choice of words tell you? What about the silences--what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

1. Is it prescriptive--telling you what people thought should happen--or descriptive--telling you what people thought did happen?

2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?

3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of "ordinary" people? From whose perspective?

4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?

5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?

6. If we have read other historians' interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

Remember, you cannot address each and every one of these questions in your presentation or in your paper, and I wouldn't want you to.



hope it helps

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What erg section lists hazmat emergency procedures?
    12·1 answer
  • Who invaded constantinople in 1453? arab muslim armies ottoman turk armies roman catholic armies eastern orthodox armies?
    10·1 answer
  • Is leaders elected by voters Athenian democracy or US democracy
    8·1 answer
  • After winning independence, Mexico developed a(n) _______ relationship with the United States.
    8·1 answer
  • What role did political machines serve in cities? ensuring public harmony and safety/ educating and serving the public good/ pro
    6·2 answers
  • PART A: What do the three conflicts in America have in common? A They were supported by reason and evidence. B They were resolve
    15·1 answer
  • ‘A great reformer’. How far do you agree with this view of Napoleon?
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!! What is the difference between the state and federal constitutions?
    5·2 answers
  • What are some of the outcomes of the progressive movement that still impact your life today?
    7·1 answer
  • Who lead a March<br> on Rome to help<br> gain power? benito mussolini or joseph stalin?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!