Maybe it means that there’s a difference between how much land they own or something. It says there was a difference between the amount of land they occupied and the amount of land they couldn’t control. So maybe they didn’t own/have a lot of land but there was a lot of land they couldn’t get to/take over etc. or maybe this situation could be vice versa so they have a ton of land but only a little isn’t “controlled” let me know if this helps sorry if it’s confusing I’m just guessing based on the context clues :)
The social Contract by Jean Jacques Rousseau, the publication of Common Sense by John Locke, and the concept of equiality among men are elements that inspired many latin american leaders. These revolutionary ideas were popular in most european universities where many latin american leaders, such as San Martin de los Andes, Mariano Martinez, and Manuel Belgrano, studied and tried to apply back in their country during the 1900s.
Answer:
loneliness for land, loneliness for attention, and loneliness for companionship
Explanation:
The answer to this question is: The magna Charta
The magna Charta is created to limit the King's power within the country. Before this document, the King's order was always considered absolute and must be obeyed. After this document, the King's orders still held a really great power, but it cannot breach what considered as basic human rights