Answer:
A). Paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article.
C). Ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community.
D). Interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other.
Explanation:
Ethically acceptable scenarios would be associated with the scenarios that are morally accurate and corresponds to impartiality, responsibility, credibility, truth, and ethics.
As per the question, options A, C, and D would be considered as ethically acceptable scenarios as they correspond to unbiased, authentic, and credible information to be presented to the viewers. <em>'paying money to attend a research' would assist in offering a wider dimension and credible information while 'ending an investigation as it may violence and disunity' exemplify 'responsibility' which is the key code of ethics and 'interviewing two CEO's' would help present an unbiased representation.</em> Thus, <u>options A, C, and D</u> are correct.
Answer:
A literary device is something authors use to change what the text means or the way that the reader should comprehend it . Figurative language is a literary device, allusion is a literary device, and euphemism is a literary device among many other things.
Explanation:
The author was a good doctor because even though he was told he would never be a surgeon, he threw away his fears and operated on Robin. After the operation, Robin was completely healed. Though the author was told he would never be a surgeon, he proved everyone wrong by throwing away his fears and worked hard.
