By using question that doesn't need an answer<span>s, </span>Thoreau appeals to all American people (who lawfully live in a country, state, etc.)<span>, </span>lifting up/raising up the tone and mood of the text<span>. </span>These questions relate to problems that are universal for all Americans<span> (</span>and all people in general<span>). </span>Question that doesn't need an answer<span>s </span>either don<span>'t </span>have an answer<span>, </span>or<span>, </span>as in this case<span>, </span>they have an obvious one<span>, </span>so that it doesn<span>'t </span>need confirming<span>. </span>However<span>, </span>obvious though it may be<span>,</span>this answer is still related only in your mind (but maybe not in real life) - and that<span>'s </span>what Thoreau was trying to change<span>. </span> <span>Thoreau </span>argues that (system or country where leaders are chosen by votes) should be better than it is now<span>. </span>It shouldn<span>'t </span>be about numbers of people who vote for or against something<span>, </span>but about the (basic, built-in, important qualities/scent) of things<span>, </span>such as human sense of right and wrong<span>. </span>Such as it is<span>, </span>(system or country where leaders are chosen by votes) has gone long way from serving the people (who lawfully live in a country, state, etc.) to becoming an end in itself<span>. </span>It has become (surviving with no outside help) and abandoned/irritated<span>. </span>It has become the state<span>'s </span>tool<span>, </span>rather than the people (who lawfully live in a country, state, etc.)'. "Must the person (who lawfully lives in a country, state, etc.) ever for a moment<span>, </span>or in the least degree<span>, </span>quit his sense of right and wrong to the law-maker<span>?" </span>- The law-maker shouldn<span>'t </span>be more important than the person (who lawfully lives in a country, state, etc.)<span>. </span>The law shouldn<span>'t </span>be more important than justice. "We should be men first<span>, </span>and subjects afterward<span>" </span>- people (who lawfully live in a country, state, etc.) should be perceived in their own right<span>, </span>and not according to their loyalty to the state<span>. </span>In other words<span>, </span>all of us are people<span>, </span>rather than just members of a nation<span>, </span>or people (who vote)<span>. </span> Hoped I Helped
The answer to whether Ariel used an effective research process is:
Yes, because Ariel is organizing his information before he starts writing.
<h3 /><h3>What is an Effective Research Process?</h3>
An effective research process involves adequate planning to be sure that the right materials are gathered before writing. This will ensure that the reader maintains a logical flow through the span of the write-up.
So since Ariel is organizing his material before writing, we can say that he has adopted a good research process.
Learn more about an effective research process here:
What does the county attorney think of Mrs Wright?
He thinks that she did not like Mr. Wright
He thinks that she was a poor housekeeper
He thinks that she worked too hard
He thinks that she was a poor housekeeper because he visited Mrs. Wright's house and was in a precarious condition.
There were two women in this visit, and they were talking about the house's condition, the county attorney tried to stop those comments.
The county attorney started to think about that bad condition, Dirty towels! [Kicks his foot against the pans under the sink.] Not much of a housekeeper.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "When two people truly love each other, distance is not an obstacle."Although he cannot speak to or interact with Olivia, Duke Orisino pines for her. The theme is best developed by this aspect of the play is that When two people truly love each other, distance is not an obstacle.
