By using question that doesn't need an answer<span>s, </span>Thoreau appeals to all American people (who lawfully live in a country, state, etc.)<span>, </span>lifting up/raising up the tone and mood of the text<span>. </span>These questions relate to problems that are universal for all Americans<span> (</span>and all people in general<span>). </span>Question that doesn't need an answer<span>s </span>either don<span>'t </span>have an answer<span>, </span>or<span>, </span>as in this case<span>, </span>they have an obvious one<span>, </span>so that it doesn<span>'t </span>need confirming<span>. </span>However<span>, </span>obvious though it may be<span>,</span>this answer is still related only in your mind (but maybe not in real life) - and that<span>'s </span>what Thoreau was trying to change<span>. </span> <span>Thoreau </span>argues that (system or country where leaders are chosen by votes) should be better than it is now<span>. </span>It shouldn<span>'t </span>be about numbers of people who vote for or against something<span>, </span>but about the (basic, built-in, important qualities/scent) of things<span>, </span>such as human sense of right and wrong<span>. </span>Such as it is<span>, </span>(system or country where leaders are chosen by votes) has gone long way from serving the people (who lawfully live in a country, state, etc.) to becoming an end in itself<span>. </span>It has become (surviving with no outside help) and abandoned/irritated<span>. </span>It has become the state<span>'s </span>tool<span>, </span>rather than the people (who lawfully live in a country, state, etc.)'. "Must the person (who lawfully lives in a country, state, etc.) ever for a moment<span>, </span>or in the least degree<span>, </span>quit his sense of right and wrong to the law-maker<span>?" </span>- The law-maker shouldn<span>'t </span>be more important than the person (who lawfully lives in a country, state, etc.)<span>. </span>The law shouldn<span>'t </span>be more important than justice. "We should be men first<span>, </span>and subjects afterward<span>" </span>- people (who lawfully live in a country, state, etc.) should be perceived in their own right<span>, </span>and not according to their loyalty to the state<span>. </span>In other words<span>, </span>all of us are people<span>, </span>rather than just members of a nation<span>, </span>or people (who vote)<span>. </span> Hoped I Helped
Explanation: According to the context of the previous statement, the most probable meaning of the word permeate would be "saturated"; since the meaning of the word permeate is the action of penetrating a body or passing through it. In the previous text the cotton clothing is soaked with water, this means that the water permeated and penetrated the clothes, to the point that it could saturate it with this liquid.
Yes, I believe she would be welcoming. Even though the last part of the poem sounds like a curse ("<span>May the young man be sad-minded with hard heart-thoughts"), it is still a statement of the speaker's enduring love for him. She suffers, but imagines that he suffers too, in the exile or wherever he is, and remembers their happy days with sorrow. Her depression has elements of embitteredness, but her love for him is not disputable.</span>
