Explanation: I think that governments should consider human rights in privileged trade with countries, so the answer is: <em>yes</em>. Human rights are first and foremost a moral principle that provides a framework for human behaviour, more precisely the ideas and ideals of moral behaviour that are prescribed by many international instruments. This means that human rights are, in fact, fundamental rights of literally everyone, regardless of race, nation or language. It is true that the goal of trade is profit, but that is why there are international laws that protect human rights and provide a framework for moral human behaviour. The protection of human rights as such is also a compulsory part of foreign policy under international law, and thus an integral part of the foreign policy of many countries, and more precisely those who respect and enforce these laws. Preferential trade rights usually refer to lowering tariffs and other preferential terms in transactions, and thus as part of a country's foreign policy may be a contribution to improving human rights with those engaged in trade. Again, if a country respects international laws of business and human rights, it should be privileged when trade is at stake, but if that country itself does not carry out its human rights policies consistently, or even threaten them among its people, then it should restrict trade with such countries. So not only should such a country not be privileged when it comes to trade, but some of the economic sanctions under international law should also be considered.
Jung Hwa, according to this scenario, is the <u>Administrator</u> at her institution.
<h3>Who is an administrator?</h3>
An administrator is one who is responsible for overseeing the daily running of an institution.
It is the role of the administrator to set the overall goals and policies of the institution or company while leaving managers to handle the pragmatic implementation of strategies.
Thus, we can conclude that Jung Hwa, according to this scenario, is the <u>Administrator</u> at her institution.
Learn more about the roles of administrators at brainly.com/question/13841711
#SPJ2
Answer:
The blank space contain the words "Post purchase dissonance"
Explanation:
Post Purchase Dissonance can be referred to as when the customer’s state of the mind and perception is in doubt after purchasing the product or service offered by a brand. This results in the customer either regretting the brand or in returning the product back from where he purchased.
Answer:
C. Additions and improvements.
Explanation:
Additions and improvements are subsequent expenditures would be capitalized.
Answer:
correct option is c. 2,200,000
Explanation:
given data
exchanged = 40,000 shares
common stock = $10
cost = $40
fair value = $55 per share
originally issued = $30 per share
to find out
total stockholders' equity will increase
solution
we will find stockholders' equity that is increase by as given formula
Increase in total shareholder's stock equity = No. of shares × Fair value per share ................1
put here value
Increase in total shareholder's stock equity = 40,000 × $55
Increase in total shareholder's stock equity = $2,200,000
so correct option is c. 2,200,000
