1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
VikaD [51]
3 years ago
9

Martin Luther king junior was a founder and the first president of the

History
1 answer:
Vadim26 [7]3 years ago
3 0
.......................................
You might be interested in
Which of these activities is an example of the application of a Bronze Age innovation? A. Publishing a book using a printing pre
SOVA2 [1]

Answer:

B. Planning where to put new buildings in a city

Explanation:

Planning where to put new structures in a city was the advancement of bronze age and a general thought of urban planning to others are associated with the Paleolithic time and printing press and industrial printing is a medieval invention.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where do some historians think the Aryans lived before they arrived in India?
docker41 [41]

most assume they came from Anatolia - known as Turkey in modern time
7 0
3 years ago
Describe the differences between the government's early "civilization" and assimilation policies and its later
iren2701 [21]

Answer:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation: Read this and you'll find your answer~!

7 0
3 years ago
How did the discovery of the Americas affect the people of Africa
insens350 [35]
Well, once the Americas were discovered and the colonist found that the soil was agreeable to grow different crops such as tobacco and cotton the colonists realized that they needed people to pick the crops. Originally indentured servants did the hard labor but then when they found that they could get labor by trading goods with African tribal leaders they resorted to importing Africans to the Americas as labor. The tribes in Africa were constantly fighting and whichever side won the losers became the slaves of the winning tribe. However, as Europeans brought valuable things to the continent of Africa such as weapons, salt, gold, and other things the leaders of the winning tribe would give their slaves to the Europeans. There were cases when Blacks captured other Blacks in Africa for the sole purpose of giving them to the European traders. Hopefully this helps. If you haven't see the movie La Amistad, it will explain in more detail what I have written. I learned a lot from that movie. I must warn you the first 5 to 10 minutes are a bit gory. I had a hard time watching that part. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is meant by a Loyalist? PLEASEEEEEEE HURRYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!​
asambeis [7]

Answer:

a Loyalist are those who support the British crown

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is true of triangular trade.
    14·1 answer
  • Can u guys plz help me with this <br>6(2x+4)=3(4x+8)​
    15·2 answers
  • How did the White Citizens Council use boycott as a weapon?
    12·1 answer
  • On which continents were Indian goods being traded ?
    14·1 answer
  • 2. Historians cannot learn about people from the past if they do not have written records. O True O False.​
    7·1 answer
  • What two cultures blended to develop Swahili?
    12·1 answer
  • All of the following were important points that the authors of the Federalist Papers stressed in their writings EXCEPT
    9·2 answers
  • Now it's time to compose your letter to the editor.
    13·2 answers
  • What are four major tipes of landforms
    12·1 answer
  • How can political parties impact voters opinions?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!