1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr_godi [17]
3 years ago
11

There should be no minimum voting age.

History
2 answers:
aliina [53]3 years ago
4 0
That statement IS arguable because not everyone would agree and also NOT defensible since theres no proof to back it up with, so the answer would be (D) 
jolli1 [7]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is A) it is defensible but not arguable.

There should be no minimum voting age. The statement about the claim that is true is "it is defensible but not arguable."

The statement could be valid for some people in some aspects because they could refer to it as liberty granted in the Constitution and the right for all people to participate in an election. But it is not defensible in that it should be irresponsible to allow children to vote because they do not have the preparation, criteria, and experience to cast a vote.

You might be interested in
Why did guilds want to influence the city government?
Sidana [21]

Guilds performed a variety of important functions in the local economy. They established a monopoly of trade in their locality or within a particular branch of industry or commerce; they set and maintained standards for the quality of goods and the integrity of trading practices in that industry; they worked to maintain stable prices for their goods and commodities; and they sought to control town or city governments in order to further the interests of the guild members and achieve their economic objectives.

5 0
3 years ago
News commentators might be called ___ on the air<br> A. Editors<br> B. Artists<br> C. Leaders
tino4ka555 [31]

Answer:artists

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the difference between ending the slave trade and ending slavery?
Dafna1 [17]

Answer:

Ending slave trade would stop the transportation of slaves but ending slavery itself gives slaves freedom to be there own person. In 1807, the British outlawed the trans-Atlantic slave trade law and in 1833, slavery itself.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Choose all that apply.
Allisa [31]
Britian had abundant sources of coal

Britian had a strong workforce

Britian had good transportation networks
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain what is a non contact force
aivan3 [116]

Explanation:

Magnetic force, gravitational force, electrostatic force.

Non-contact forces are forces that don't have to touch each other to exert forces inbetween eachother

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jasmine, a twenty-two year old woman accused of armed robbery, maintains her innocence. However, she waives her right to a jury
    8·2 answers
  • Why were the events that took place on November 9, 1938, called Kristallnacht? People recognized that Nazis were forcing Jews fr
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following were responsible of a guild
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the countries of Europe try to take over territory in Southeast Asia
    11·1 answer
  • During world war 1 most attacks in no-mans land led to ?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an economic impact of the Byzantine Empire?
    6·1 answer
  • After passage of the Colonization Law of 1824 by the Mexican government, the Mexican state of Coahuila y Texas stipulated that,
    9·1 answer
  • The main economic basis of the empire of Mali was derived from the agricultural production of the rural areas.however,the main e
    8·1 answer
  • What is the major difference between the two types of countries in the region​
    11·1 answer
  • Why do you think that Lieutenant Spears doesn't ever address the rumors that are
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!