Question

There should be no minimum voting age.

Answer 1

That statement IS arguable because not everyone would agree and also NOT defensible since theres no proof to back it up with, so the answer would be (D) 

Answer 2

The correct answer is A) it is defensible but not arguable.

There should be no minimum voting age. The statement about the claim that is true is "it is defensible but not arguable."

The statement could be valid for some people in some aspects because they could refer to it as liberty granted in the Constitution and the right for all people to participate in an election. But it is not defensible in that it should be irresponsible to allow children to vote because they do not have the preparation, criteria, and experience to cast a vote.