There should be no minimum voting age.

2 answers:

4 0

That statement IS arguable because not everyone would agree and also NOT defensible since theres no proof to back it up with, so the answer would be (D)

jolli1 [7]2 years ago

3 0

The correct answer is A) it is defensible but not arguable.

There should be no minimum voting age. The statement about the claim that is true is "it is defensible but not arguable."

The statement could be valid for some people in some aspects because they could refer to it as liberty granted in the Constitution and the right for all people to participate in an election. But it is not defensible in that it should be irresponsible to allow children to vote because they do not have the preparation, criteria, and experience to cast a vote.

You might be interested in

Do (a) private citizens or (b) the government have a duty to help the poor? Explain your answers using details that you have lea

salantis [7]

Helping the poor is an important duty for the affluent and the government as well. There are several reasons why the poor should be helped by private citizens, such as out of philanthropic course. For government,the welfare of its citizens rests on its shoulder in the promise that it would champion the well being of all members.

5 0

2 years ago

All these were part of president Washington’s cabinet except the

olga_2 [115]

Answer:

The answer is not one of these, so it has to be the last one.

Department of War.

Department of State.

Treasury Department.

7 0

2 years ago

The m the most fundamental weakness of the articles of confederation was a lack of

Nadusha1986 [10]

Lack of Power to raise funds for the militia. The significant defeat of the Articles of Confederation was just shortcoming. The government, under the Articles, was excessively feeble, making it impossible to authorize their laws and in this way had no power. The Continental Congress had acquired cash to battle the Revolutionary War and couldn't reimburse their obligations.

3 0

3 years ago

Slavery in Rome differed

Solnce55 [7]

Answer: In the Roman Empire, slaves could obtain freedom much more quickly than slaves during 1600s-1800s in North America. Also, in the Roman Empire, slaves were at times educated, held status within their households and were valued by their owners

7 0

3 years ago

Where else would you look in order to figure out how the korean war started?

galben [10]

You could look at war documents to see how it started.

7 0

3 years ago