Answer:
B. =PV(.06,10,0,10000)
Explanation:
In MS Excel the formula of Present value re is as "=PV( rate, nper, pmt, [fv] )".
PV = Present value
rate = Interest rate= 6% = 0.06
nper = number of periods = 10
pmt = payment made each period = 0 in this scenario
fv = future value = 10,000
So, according to the formula the correct sequence is =PV(.06,10,0,10000)
which is correctly mentioned in option B.
Answer:
Dr Work in Process 574,000
Dr Manufacturing Overhead 163,000
Cr Wages Payable 737,000
Explanation:
Preparation of the journal entry to record the direct and indirect labor costs incurred during the year
Based on the information given the appropriate journal entry to record the direct and indirect labor costs incurred during the year will be :
Dr Work in Process 574,000
Dr Manufacturing Overhead 163,000
Cr Wages Payable 737,000
(574,000+163,000)
(Being to record direct and indirect labor costs incurred )
Answer:
I think it's Naert's model, I may be wrong tho. Sorry if it's wrong. :(
If married and unmarried women respond similarly to a sale on perfume, these hypothetical segments fail the differentiable criterion for useful market segments.
<h3><u>
What are Market Segments?</u></h3>
- People who are gathered together for marketing purposes are referred to as market segments.
- Market segments are subsets of a broader market that frequently group people together based on one or more shared traits.
- Companies and their marketing departments define a target market for their goods and services using a variety of factors.
- Marketing experts use a unique strategy to each market segment after thoroughly understanding the demands, way of life, demography, and personality of the target consumer.
In a market that is otherwise uniform, a market segment is a group of customers with comparable preferences. These clients may consist of people, families, companies, organizations, or a combination of several types.
Therefore, the hypothetical segment in the question fail the differentiable criterion for useful market segments.
Know more about market segments with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/27993208
#SPJ4
Answer:
States have a high duty to adhere to the federal laws and state rule as well, wherever it is applicable. But in case the state has unique requirement, it may enact and enforce its own law which suits the local population rather than use of federal law. When it comes to federal drug laws, the states have a responsibility to work along with the federal authorities and government to make sure that the laws are in place. This includes not bringing about conflicting laws.
Congress should allow the employers to set their own rules. For example, if an employer does not allow employees to drink during working hours, there is no problem with it. Similarly if an employer chooses not to hire anyone with visible tattoo on their body, then that is completely employers’ discretion. Similarly if the employers have company wide policy to avoid marijuana, then that is employers’ business. There are many NGOs where the employers do not allow smoking or recruit smokers. There is nothing wrong with it. Now, unless an employee has medical justification for consuming marijuana, the employer should be within their right to decide on action on the employee. This is why Congress should not interfere in the employer-employee relationship.
Given that in absolute conflict, the federal laws trump the state laws, marijuana is not legal in any of the states even if the state law permits it. The only reason the US Government is not taking action against recreational marijuana in the mentioned states is because it is too cumbersome and the outcome is not that significant. There is not a great deal of state benefit by arresting the farmers growing marijuana or the people distributing it. Thus it is still illegal but the government is not acting upon it.
