answer= checks and balances
Explanation:
Federalist No. 51 addresses means by which appropriate checks and balances can be created in government and also advocates a separation of powers within the national government. This idea of checks and balances became a crucial document in the establishment of the modern U.S. system of checks and balances.
D) a reversal of religious toleration policies
Explanation:
- Shah Jahan was the ruler who marked a transitional period in the history of India under Muslim rule. At the end of the seventeenth century, it was clear that the Mogul Empire was beginning to decline.
- The military and the court were too expensive for the state budget, and the rulers continued to invest in lavish cultural achievements, neglecting the agriculture on which all that wealth was based. The
- economic crisis came to light during the reign of Aurangzeb (1658-1707), who believed that the solution to the crisis lay in the greater discipline of Muslim society.
- His insecurity was particularly reflected in his murderous hatred of Muslim "heretics" as well as members of other faiths.
- The heirs abandoned his policy, but the damage had already been done. Even the Muslims themselves were dissatisfied: there was nothing truly Islamic in Aurangzeb's ardent fulfillment of Sharia. Specifically, Sharia advocates justice for all, including the winters. Thus the Mughal Empire began to disintegrate, with local Muslim governors striving to take control of their territories as independent state units.
Learn more on Mughal Empire on
brainly.com/question/1841123
brainly.com/question/1373518
brainly.com/question/909715
#learnwithBrainly
Americans were first attacked in Pearl Harbour by Japanese during WWII,leading them to join the war,the event is called Pearl Habour Incident.
Hope it helps!
Answer:
This a hard question to answer because there are two correct answers; the Romans did establish the first code of law around 200 B.C. but they also lasted for 1000+ years. it is up to you one which to choose of the two but i know they were definitely not a socialist government. (explanation on why the answer isn't socialist government)
Explanation:
There were some precursors in ancient societies to modern systems like capitalism and socialism but ancient Rome was neither capitalist nor socialist. The economy was, at its core, agrarian and based on systems of tribute, patronage, and, to a lesser extent, commerce. This proves that the answer is most definitely not they had a socialist government
Sir Walter Raleigh was responsible for the settlement at Roanoke Island?