Under the Privacy Act of 1974:

1 answer:

7 0

Answer: B. an employee can seek both civil and criminal remedies for violations of the Act by Federal Government employers.

Explanation: The Privacy Act of 1974 does not cover the private sector organizations,it was enacted specifically for Federal Government employees. This Act was enacted specifically to achieve the following;

Restrict access to private information of individuals, Right of Access to private information of individuals, Fairness in execution of Governmental function with regards to information sharing and the right for it to be amended.

You might be interested in

Rise to a point of order may never interrupt a speaker.<br><br><br> A. True <br> B. False

ser-zykov [4K]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

wkkdjdkwlqlqp1owodkdks

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Describe what the chain of command is and its purpose in the investigation.

Katena32 [7]

Answer:

The exact definition for chain of command when it comes to evidence is the witnessed and written record of everyone who came in contact with the evidence and had unbroken control of it. Following the chain of command ensures that the evidence collected at the scene is the same evidence that is entered in the courtroom.

Does this help?

5 0

3 years ago

Where might an experienced HazMat firefighter have received his training? previous chemical fires at factories, exposure to toxi

swat32

Answer: Previous chemical fires at factories and exposure to toxic landfill

Explanation: I just took this test :)

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which type of strategies were most successful in achieving results in cities? Explain how these strategies were implemented.

yuradex [85]

Answer:

strategists best ensure that strategies will be effectively implemented

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Sally agrees to roof a house for Bob. After doing his research, Bob chooses Sally based on her great reputation for being consci

Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

c. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence.

Explanation:

Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence. Sally is obligated for his carelessness. Since Sally employed Glen and the obligation of any carelessness turns into Sally's inevitably.

3 0

3 years ago