1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pshichka [43]
4 years ago
7

Under the Privacy Act of 1974:

Law
1 answer:
vodomira [7]4 years ago
7 0

Answer: B. an employee can seek both civil and criminal remedies for violations of the Act by Federal Government employers.

Explanation: The Privacy Act of 1974 does not cover the private sector organizations,it was enacted specifically for Federal Government employees. This Act was enacted specifically to achieve the following;

Restrict access to private information of individuals, Right of Access to private information of individuals, Fairness in execution of Governmental function with regards to information sharing and the right for it to be amended.

You might be interested in
Describe the preamble of the constitution
Olenka [21]

Answer:

The preamble sets the stage for the Constitution. It clearly communicates the intentions of the framers and the purpose of the document. The preamble is an introduction to the highest law of the land; it is not the law. It does not define government powers or individual rights.

Explanation:

Hope this helped, Have a Wonderful Day!!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
.What is the difference between a case on point and a case on “all fours”? Why is finding either of these important when researc
kifflom [539]

Answer: if you put your mom in your room how many of your dads would come back 8

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Dabney v. State
alexgriva [62]

The Special Court of Appeals’ arguments that Dabney could not commit attempted fourth-degree burglary is that thinking of the crime does not make you a criminal and thus, the defendant can not be convicted of a non-exsitence crime.

<h3>What is the case of Dabney v. State?</h3>

The defender "Dabney" was convicted for attempt 4th degree burglary but appealed on the grounds he did not actually commit it.

Hence, he could not be convicted of actus reus of being on the property no criminal significance in its own right absent the mens rea of an intent to commit theft.

Read more about Dabney v. State

brainly.com/question/26537644

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Your license may be suspended for as long as one year if you allow someone to
andrezito [222]

Answer:

Whats the question..?

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why does soft money tend to exert more influence in elections than hard money? a.Soft money can only be used for ads that are no
zheka24 [161]

Answer:

C, i may be wrong but if not can i have brainliest... much appreciated

Explanation:

Hard money refers to coins, while soft money refers to paper currency. But the terms also have a role in politics. They are used to refer to political contributions in the United States.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please describe three acts that are considered “crimes” in California but that you do not consider to be immoral/unethical
    15·1 answer
  • Arrange the steps of extraction of DNA in the order in which theyshould be performed.
    11·1 answer
  • The possession of ____ is against federal law.
    11·1 answer
  • 3. How long can a justice serve on the Supreme Court?
    9·1 answer
  • Robbers attack your house in the middle of the night. They want to steal your family's money and precious things (laptop, cellph
    9·1 answer
  • Making school punishment more uniform through the zero tolerance policy was intended to:
    15·1 answer
  • You are taking an exam and you haven’t studied for it. Your teacher isn’t looking, so you could cheat and probably not get caugh
    10·2 answers
  • How to prove provocation in Crimes​
    5·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast enumerated and implied powers in TWO paragraphs describing the similarities and differences between these t
    15·1 answer
  • _____ means that laws must be applied fairly and equally to all people, especially to a citizen accused of a crime.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!