oh cool how was it there?
I have no idea but I think it all relies on how many points you have
Answer:
A) <u>viejo</u>, remoto, <u>antiguo, arcaico, añejo </u>
b) <u>aumentar, incrementar</u>, disminuir, <u>crecer, ampliar</u>
c) <u>defender,</u> atacar, <u>proteger, cuidar, resguardar</u>
Explanation:
A) Remoto es la única palabra que no sigue la línea de algo de hace años, antiguo y viejo. Remoto es algo que remite a lejanía pero no en el sentido del resto de las palabras. Entonces, las palabras que siguen el mismo significado son: Viejo, Antiguo, Arcaico, Añejo
B) Disminuir es la única palabra que significa lo opuesto a todo el resto. Aumentar, Incrementar, Crecer y Ampliar significan que algo aumenta o crece en tamaño, mientras disminuir es el antónimo de esas palabras.
C) Atacar es el antónimo de la serie de palabras que implican cuidado y protección, el mantener a alguien o a algo seguro. La serie de palabras iguales son: Defender, Proteger, Cuidar y Resguardar.
The positivist thesis does not say that law’s merits are unintelligible, unimportant, or peripheral to the philosophy of law. It says that they do not determine whether laws or legal systems exist. Whether a society has a legal system depends on the presence of certain structures of governance, not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice, democracy, or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.). Austin thought the thesis “simple and glaring”. While it is probably the dominant view among analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and misunderstandings.
