<span>The answer would be syllogism. This is a type of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to get an outcome grounded on two or more suggestions that are declared or supposed to be true. Example: All mammals are warm-blooded. Therefore, all brown dogs are warm-blooded.</span>
Answer:
i think it's the last option but i might be wrong
Animals have to adapt to the food that live there plus if there is a body of water fish and organisms that live in that water have to adapt to the type of fish in that water.
Chemokines act as chemoattractants. They lead <span>to the migration of immune cells to an infection site so they can target and destroy invading bodies such as microbes. Hope this helps.</span>
Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
The effect may not be real because we don't know if the results are reproducible: Peers can identify flaws in the experimental design because an experiment must have a clear design in order to be reproducible by other researchers or else they would not have scientific validity.
The treatment kills cancer cells, but it might simply be a poison that kills all cells—even normal cells: It is possible that in the design of the experiment carried out only cancer cells were used but it had not been performed in healthy cells, which would imply the possibility that the fungus kills all the cells.
Cell samples were taken from too few patients: This may be another mistake because when only a small sample is analyzed it is not certain if the fungi are the ones that kill the cancer cells or are other conditions of the analyzed patient.
