Answer: Here is the poem.
They had just finished singing it for the third time when Squealer, attended by two dogs, approached them with the air of having something important to say. He announced that, by a special decree of Comrade Napoleon, "Beasts of England" had been abolished. From now onwards it was forbidden to sing it. The animals were taken aback. "Why?" cried Muriel. "It's no longer needed, comrade," said Squealer stiffly. "'Beasts of England' was the song of the Rebellion. But the Rebellion is now completed. The execution of the traitors this afternoon was the final act. The enemy both external and internal has been defeated. In 'Beasts of England' we expressed our longing for a better society in days to come. But that society has now been established. Clearly this song has no longer any purpose." Frightened though they were, some of the animals might possibly have protested, but at this moment the sheep set up their usual bleating of "Four legs good, two legs bad," which went on for several minutes and put an end to the discussion. So "Beasts of England" was heard no more. In its place Minimus, the poet, had composed another song which began: Animal Farm, Animal Farm, Never through me shalt thou come to harm! and this was sung every Sunday morning after the hoisting of the flag. But somehow neither the words nor the tune ever seemed to the animals to come up to "Beasts of England
Minimus represents the producers of state-approved songs and slogans in Stalin's era.
Explanation:
The exercept was from "Animal farm"was an Utopian satire written by George Orwell and it was published in 1945. This was a fable based on Russian communistic system during g the Satllin regime and the betrayal of the cause of Joseph Satlin betrayal. The satire illustrate illustrate the way Stalinism had betrayed the ideals of the socialist revolution in the Soviet Union. The poet Minimus introduces a new song that is sung on Sunday mornings
Answer:
T
Explanation:
The notes don't have to be in-depth but the notes can provide a reason to why or why not the results are the way they are. It can also keep the survey organized, with the notes, its possible to split the results into men and women, old or young, and much much more.
1. The fact of being who or what a person or thing is.
or
2. a close similarity or affinity.
hope this helps plz follow me ❤
Answer:
The speaker is concerned that the subject of the poem will become lost during her life is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Jimmy Santiago Baca was born in 1952 in Santa Fe. According to <em>Poetry Foundation</em>, "of Chicano and Apache descent". In the mentioned poem, I am offering this poem, the speaker creates a world around the poem, the only possession he has to offer the subject. In the second stanza, he does talk about warmth provided to the object, but it is not the stanza mentioned in the question. In general, the idea of the <em>whole</em> poem could be resumed in letter D statement. Even though it looks like that at the very beginning of the third stanza, the speaker doesn't provide directions to travel through the wilderness. In this stanza, the speaker is concerned that the subject will become lost during her life, and also mentions he would always be with the object.
