1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jek_recluse [69]
3 years ago
12

Which of the following would most likely NOT have a direct correlation with an increase in productivity for a company?

History
1 answer:
tamaranim1 [39]3 years ago
8 0

“Increase in company stock prices” is NOT likely to have a direct correlation with an increase in productivity in a company because when speaking about productivity it refers to improving the amount of products manufactured or sold by a company. For example, if a company that assembles cars today makes 1.000 cars per day and then increases that amount to 2.000 cars assembled per day, company productivity has improved 100%.

Company productivity may increase for the following reasons:

• Buying new technology: following the car company example, if it acquires new technology that speeds up the production process, such as an assembly machine, then more cars will be made.

• Additional training for their labor force: If the company that bought a new machine trains its labor force to use it, then production will also increase as employees know how to handle the equipment.

• Hiring additional workers: more qualified workers mean more production. For example, a company has 50 workers and they make 100 pair of shoes daily, then it hires 50 more workers so they make 200 pair of shoes by day. Therefore, the company productivity has increased.


You might be interested in
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Oduvanchick [21]

One of the <em>leading organizations </em>of the temperance movement was the <em>Woman's Christian Temperance Union</em> and they preached abstinence from;

  • Alcohol, in the eighteenth century

According to the given question, we are asked to state the things which the temperate movement preached and how the <em>Woman's Christian Temperance Union</em> was such an important fact.

As a result of this, we can see that the temperance movement was made popular in the eighteenth century and as a result of this, they preached for the abstinence from alcoholism and advocated for moderation.

Read more about temperance movement here:

brainly.com/question/2724002

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were the british able to conquer india?
melisa1 [442]
There are a good number of reasons why the British were able to do so, and in fact rule over India effectively for over a century.

Disunity among Indian princely states. India was more a collection of warring princely states, at loggerheads with each other. The British sucessfully used this to play off one state against another. Add to it there was no dearth of people willing to betray the kingdom for a few pieces of silver. Robert Clive succeeded at Plassey, because Mir Jaffar was willing to betray his master Siraj-Ud-Daulah in lie of being the Nawab. Mir Jaffar himself was betrayed by Mir Qasim later on.Tipu Sultan one of the most redoubtable fighters against the British rule, was finally defeated, as the Marathas, King of Mysore, Nizam of Hyderabad all joined hands with the British.
Superiority over other colonial powers. The other colonial powers in India competing for the share of resources were France,Portugal,Denmark, Holland. Of the 4, Denmark and Holland could never really be serious competitors to the British, they had their own trading posts, scattered around, but were never a serious threat. Portugal focussed primarily on the Western coast, Goa, parts of Kerala, Karnataka, and this left the British with vast swathes of unoccupied territory. That left France as the major contender to Britian in the race for colonialism. The British Army was more well equipped, more professional, more disciplined compared to the French army, suffering from indiscipline and corruption. This made the British win key battles all over the East Coast, as they effectively grabbed control.
Doctrine of Lapse. One of the most effective tactics, the British used to take over most of India. Instead of waging an all out war against some of the princely states, they signed a treaty with them, where in if the ruling king died without a heir, the East India company could take over that. And that is how Satara became one of the first states to end up under British rule. And that was also the main reason for the conflict in Jhansi.
Subsidiary alliance was also an effective instrument. According to this alliance, the kingdom which signs the treaty will have to maintain the following rules:

The British agreed to maintain a permanent and fixed subsidiary force within the territory of their ally.
In return, they didn't take money but took over a part of the territory of the ally.
A British officer called "resident" was placed at the court of the ruler.{he could interfere in the internal matters of the kingdom}
The ally could not maintain any relation with any other ruler without the approval of the British.{so,when the rulers wanted to revolt against the British they are alone.}
The Indian rulers felt a false sense of security but in reality they were losing their independence. On the other hand the Britishers maintained large forces at the expenses of the Indian rulers and also increase their area of influence. Some states brought under control through this policy are Hyderabad, Tanjore, Awadh, etc.
At the end of it all, the British had the advantage of better manpower, were militarily more powerful and stronger, and add to it they had some very canny strategists too. And the disunity among Indian princely states, their constant warring with each other, just added to the advantage.
3 0
3 years ago
Which statements describe the rising action of a tragedy’s plot? Select 2 options.
seropon [69]

Answer:

A series of events develop the plot’s central conflict.

Suspense builds gradually as the plot progresses.

Explanation:

Rising action in a story is when there is tension in the story and the main conflict happens. It happens before the climax of the story, where there is a build-up of tension in the story and the main conflict of the story is presented.

Thus, the rising action in a story is when a series of events develop from the plot's central conflict, resulting in the build-up of suspense in the story. This will eventually lead to the climax of the story and then bring upon the falling action.

Thus, the correct answers are the first and third options.  

4 0
4 years ago
Madison's addition of the Bill of Rights pleased Anti-Federalists' concerns about the constitution because
zmey [24]
<span>they added protections for individuals and limited the federal government's power by leaving any unspecified powers to the states.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
What is a distinguishing feature of democracy
Mkey [24]
Popular sovereignity
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • According to the Constitution the President has the right to make treaties with foreign nations, but before they can go into eff
    11·1 answer
  • Describe the difference between Britain and France’s use of land
    13·1 answer
  • About ___ years elapsed from the first shots of the Revolutionary War to its official end.
    9·1 answer
  • In what way did geography affect the development of India differently than in the development of China?
    11·1 answer
  • When nations come together and make official agreements it is called a
    5·2 answers
  • How did the government encourage the idea of Manifest Destiny?
    7·1 answer
  • How do interest groups influence American Government
    10·2 answers
  • With the ___of people from fertile areas, knowledge of agriculture spread<br> by
    12·1 answer
  • Which geographic factor led to the formation of Iceland's rugged terrain? PLEASE HELP ME
    11·2 answers
  • Which statement best completes the diagram
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!