Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled in favour of the Complainants, enforcing the contract.
Explanation:
The Lucy Vs Zehmer case was one of decision on if a contract was binding or not on the basis of the undisclosed intentions of the parties involved in the contract. Zehmer alleged that he had jokingly sold and transferred title to Lucy while drunk. However the court ruled that contract for the sale of land to Lucy was valid on the basis that the secret intentions of Zehmer was not known or disclosed in the sale of the land and only his actions count for the contract to be binding.
Answer:
50 Months
Explanation:
If there is no compound interest it would be 50 Months. You would divide 250,000 by 5,000 to get the months.
<span>Becky is a private accountant whose work is mainly with managerial accounting. Managerial accounting is a process o identifying, measuring, analyzing, interpreting, and communicating information in order to achieve the goals of an organization. Another name for managerial accounting is cost accounting.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is C. the output level where marginal cost is equal to marginal benefit .
Explanation:
Competitive equilibrium Traditional concept of economic equilibrium used for the analysis of goods markets with flexible prices and many agents, which usually serve as a benchmark for efficiency in economic analysis. Crucially, it depends on the assumption of a context in which each agent makes decisions about such a small amount compared to the total amount traded in the market that their individual transactions have no influence on prices.
It consists of a price system and an allocation of the production and consumption of the economy among the various agents, such that, given the prices, each agent maximizing its objective function (benefits, preferences) subject to restrictions (technological, of resources) plans to trade its share in the proposed allocation, at prices that make all exchanges compatible with each other by balancing the markets, that is, matching the aggregate supply with the demand aggregate of each of the goods and services traded.
Answer:
an increase in the price of both
Explanation:
A decrease in the supply of paprika would cause an increase in the price of both substitute goods. When the supply of paprika falls, the demand will be greater than what is available for sale and this would cause the sellers to raise it's price afterall it is now scarce.
Also as a substitute good, more people would begin to switch to buying cummin which would raise the demand for cummin. This increase in demand for cummin would then cause the price of cummin to go up.
