Using a market development investment-driven strategy, the SBU (Strategic Business Unit) that can be transformed into a star is a question mark SBU.
The characteristics of a question mark SBU are:
- high growth prospects
- low market share
- consumes a lot of cash
- generates little returns
- loses money
For the transformation of a question mark SBU, more investments and new strategies have to be brought in.
Thus, a question mark SBU has the highest potential to turn into a star if the market growth is high.
Read more about the BCG growth share matrix at brainly.com
Answer: <u><em> The measured-GDP would increase by $5 billion.</em></u>
Explanation:
Given :
Inventories fall by $2 billion,
Consumption increases by $8 billion,
Welfare Payments decline by $3 billion,
Export increases by $1 billion
Import also increases by $2 billion.
Note: While calculating GDP we will not include Welfare payments in it.
GDP = 
GDP = $5 billion
Answer:
Using an excel spreadsheet I prepared an amortization schedule. For the 61st payment, the interest rate is increased from 0.5% to 0.625% monthly.
(a) Calculate the loan balance immediately after the 84th payment.
(b) Calculate the amount of interest in the 84th payment.
(c) Calculate the amount of the balloon payment.
As you can see, the interest amount for the 61st payment increases, while it had been decreasing previously.
Answer:
Option A, “the substitution effect dominates the income effect” is correct.
Explanation:
If the real wage increases then the opportunity cost for leisure will also increase. Therefore, an increase in real wages and a rise in the opportunity cost of leisure induce labor to supply more workforce or labor force. This is known as the substitution effect. Moreover, when this substitution effect is greater than the income effect then the supply curve for labor is upward sloping.
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
