Answer:
Supreme Court
Explanation:
In 1930, Franklin Roosevelt was elected as President of United States when country was suffering the crisis of Great depression. He was elected due to his promise to revive the economy of country by providing fiscal support to the banks and also follow the policies of expansion. However this type of economic reforms was not accepted by court and he always have to face lot of difficulties in passing these reforms and among this New Deal was most important.
Therefore Roosevelt with his political actions circumvent the power of Supreme court which was the main hurdle in his coarse of action. Moreover due to his stong leadership, United States manage to succed the biggest crisis of Great dipression by 1930s.
Only that they both deposed an unpopular king. After that they differ....The British 'Glorious' was done without bloodshed or violence, and a new Queen (the deposed Kings daughter) was right away placed on throne as new leader, leading to peace and prosperity.
The French...was done with lots of violence, rioting and bloodshed including the execution of the deposed king, the queen and their children. The French never got around to placing a new king or leader on the murdered king's throne, so chaos was the result.
Most privitisation was done by boris yeltskin but finished by Gorbachev
So A is the answer.
The answer is TRUE because the articles of confederation were weak.
The standard of living is improved through something called "comparative advantages", which means that, relative to the nations' total output and ability to make other things, each nation produces something that they're better at making than the other. When the nations trade, they are able to use these comparative advantages to create a more efficient, productive economy.
Even if one nation is wealthier or better off than the other, this principle means that both countries can still become better off through trade.