Yes. Source D is more believable because Source C is from a book that “Criticizes the building of the dam”. It is only a comment by a journalist and source D is information that was released by the Chinese government itself. Source D also gives a more detailed explanation about what will happen because of the project.
Court precedents are used in case of having no clear interpretation of the law for a particular case. President's precedents are simply acts performed by a President in a similar situation.
Explanation:
<u>Court precedents serve as an alternate to written laws when the existing guided laws are not suitable or simply not enough for a particular situation that arises.</u>
For this, the court can refer to a previous judgement as basis for their own judgement. <u>Thus, court precedents are enforceable by law.</u>
<u>Precedents set by a President serve at best, as guidelines.</u>
They are simply acts performed by a previous President when met with a similar situation.
The answer is; because it both authorises spending and appropriate funds.
<em>Hope this helped! :)</em>
The United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between European powers; (2) the United States recognized and would not interfere with existing colonies and dependencies in the Western Hemisphere; (3) the Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization; and (4) any attempt by a European power to oppress or control any nation in the Western Hemisphere would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.
<span>What is the most powerful act of political participation?
A. voting
</span>
