All categories

3 years ago

HELP!

Business

2 answers:

DiKsa [7]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

A. Partnership

Explanation:

Based on the description of this scenario it can be said that the best option for Mary would be a Partnership. This means that she will share ownership and profit with those involved but at the same time will also share the liabilities. This will make sure that the other tattoo artists will do their utmost best since they will have to deal with the consequences as well if they do not. Which in term protects Mary.

rusak2 [61]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

C. Corporation

Explanation:

Just took the test

A P E X

You might be interested in

E-Eyes has a new issue of preferred stock it calls 20/20 preferred. The stock will pay a $20 dividend per year, but the first di

Sever21 [200]

Answer:

You would pay approximately $35.00 today

Explanation:

The cost of the stock at the beginning of the year 20

= 20/9.75%

= 20/0.0975

= 205.13 dollars

We find the current price of the stock

= Fv/(1+r)^n

= 205.13/(1+9.75%)¹⁹

= 205.13/1.0975¹⁹

= 205.13/5.86

= $35.00

From this calculation you have to pay 35 Dollars today.

5 0

3 years ago

Outstanding checks

oksano4ka [1.4K]

D) Haven't been presented to the bank for payment but have been subtracted in the checkbook

3 0

3 years ago

The table below presents the average and marginal cost of producing cheeseburgers per hour at a roadside diner.

Butoxors [25]

Answer:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is falling and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is rising.

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is rising and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is at a minimum.

Explanation:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is falling and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is rising.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average total cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is falling.

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the marginal cost of production is rising.

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is rising and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is at a minimum.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 70 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is rising.

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of cheeseburger production at quantities of 50 and 60 cheeseburgers per hour are equal and the lowest on the table, this implies that the average total cost of cheeseburger production is at a minimum at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour.

7 0

3 years ago

According to the value in diversity problem-solving approach A. surface-level diversity is less likely to lead to team cohesion

marshall27 [118]

Answer:

The correct answer is option E (diversity in teams is beneficial because it provides for a larger pool of knowledge from which a team can draw as it carries out its work).

Explanation:

Diversity in an organization/team is broad in its definition as it describes a group of individuals who are from different backgrounds, races, ages, education working for a common goal.

When we talk about surface-level diversity, then we are pointing at those visible differences such as sex, age. While Deep-level diversity is those characters that are not visible such as beliefs, likes, dislikes, temperament.

Diversity in teams is beneficial because team members would have diverse backgrounds, experiences, problem-solving capacities, exposures, bringing diverse solutions to the team which leads to good team performance, and a quick, better solution to problems.

3 0

3 years ago

What is the type of occupation of densist

ivann1987 [24]

Answer:

Dentist is an occupation related to dental/tooth disease.

Explanation:

It is an occupation related to dentistry which is in the field of health.

7 0

2 years ago