What was the result of the U.S. Senate's refusal to approve the Treaty of Versailles?

2 answers:

8 0

The result was that the Treaty of Versailles could not be passed. The Senate needed a two-thirds majority to pass the treaty, but the Republicans were vehemently opposed to passing the treaty, because they felt they needed more reservations were needed and did not like the idea that the League of Nations could declare a war without asking for a vote by the U.S. Congress. There was also significant opposition by the Irish Catholics and German Democrats who felt this was giving too much power to Britain. As a result, the treaty was never ratified, but separate agreements were signed.

dedylja [7]3 years ago

3 0

The league of nations was ineffective

You might be interested in

In Sparta, boys were trained as warriors at age _.

lyudmila [28]

Answer:

Explanation:

In Sparta, boys were trained to be warriors at age 7.

7 0

2 years ago

Who were two of the prominent women given roles in President Clinton's cabinet? EXTRA POINTS

Anna [14]

The two of the prominent women given roles in President Clinton's cabinet were Madeleine Albright and Condoleezza Rice. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question are the second and the third option. there were several other women members present in the cabinet, but none were as prominent as these two.

3 0

2 years ago

witch of the following state executive departments is BEST suited to handle issues related to mining an oil production

Lera25 [3.4K]

D. natural resources is the answer

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are some of the methods used in idealism

BartSMP [9]

Answer: Lecture, Discussion, and Socratic Dialogue.

Explanation: Source:Go/oogle

Have a Good Day!

5 0

1 year ago

1. Compare the views of Bradstreet and Johnson toward American Indians.

fredd [130]

Answer:

To begin with, Colonel John Bradstreet starts his statement off by calling the American Indians "savages", the "less useful, and "greatest villains". You can infer that Bradstreet does not like or want a relationship with the American Indians at all. In his statement he emphasizes how the Indians are defenseless, and that they are raising jealousy. I can tell that Bradstreet does not like the encounters with the Indians, nor think they are helpful people. Williams Johnson starts his statement off with saying that the colonist had the wrong idea about the Indians and that they " greatly dispised them" without even knowing their power or knowledge of these lands. He wanted a bond with the Indians that were beneficial; he also believed that the Indians had their own way of living and that they were useful.

The two perceptions are completely different. Bradstreet has a negative perception of the Indians the whole throughout the whole statement. He believes that the Indians are not a ally, but more of an enemy. Johnson on the other hand believes that the colonist hasn't gave the Indians a chance to show them their knowledge. He also believes that the Indians could be allies, and not enemy's.

Explanation:

On Edge 2020.

6 0

2 years ago