Answer:
Justinian's Proceedings.
Explanation:
The Proceedings of Emperor Justinian had a great influence on the future development of law. Its impact is greater in Europe and smaller in Asia. The legal systems of many modern countries are still based today on the elements of Justinian law. Already at the beginning of his reign, Justinian sought to reform Roman law, which had changed a great deal over time. Some fragments of legal acts before the reform were recounted, and many of them contained earlier acts of slavery. At the time of the creation of the law, and even later, the Roman Empire was more feudal than the slave. Justinian's Proceedings are the foundation of modern law.
Answer:
The National Party was elected in 1948 on the policy of Apartheid ('separateness'). This 'separateness' put South Africans of different racial groups on their own paths in a partitioned system of development.
Explanation:
<h3>Effects of the Group Areas Act</h3>
The GAA had strange implications for governance and responsibility as it became more elaborate and amended. For example, the Coloured townships of Coronationville, Noordgesig, Newclare, Riverlea, and Western Township are administrated by Johannesburg City Council while Bosmont is the responsibility of the Department of Community Development (South African Institute of Race Relations, 1964: 216). The work of welfare organizations was made more difficult by the GAA, like Lunalegwaba House, a group home for African boys, in Johannesburg could not operate because the regulations of the GAA did not allow the White charity to own the property (South African Institute for Race Relations, 1967: 306). People attempted to use the courts to overturn the GAA, though each time they were unsuccessful (Dugard, 1978, 324). Others decided to use civil disobedience and other protests, like ‘sit-ins’ at restaurants, were experienced across South Africa in the early 60s. The 'sit-ins' were not ill-received by the average White citizen, which the South African Institute of Race Relations believed proved that they did not object to sharing restaurants with the other racial groups (1961: 183). There was also resistance from Cape Town City Council who voted before 1964 to keep District Six and the central business district not dedicated to any one racial group; they had the support of the Cape Town Chamber of Commerce on this decision (South African Institute of Race Relations, 1964: 213).
The Second Estate did all of the following except of side with the peasants.
Answer:
I'm sorry sir but there is no specific name for that action. I tried to search on google about that and I didn't find anything
Explanation:
