Answer:
There had been several wars between the two empires in the years preceding the French-Indian war – King William’s War of 1689–97, Queen Anne’s War of 1702-13 and King George’s War of 1744 – 48, all American aspects of European wars – and tensions remained. By 1754 Britain controlled nearly one and a half million colonists, France around only 75,000 and expansion was pushing the two closer together, increasing the stress.
Explanation:
The context of the speech can be placed on what is promoted on the Charter of the Organization of American States (OAS), founded back in 1910 under the name of Pan American Society of the United States as a regional agency dedicated to promote peace, collaboration and solidarity among the countries of North, Central and South America. Dean Acheson was known at some point as the architect of foreign policy during the Truman administration. The speech of Dean Acheson back in 1949, made reference to those cases when a government is overthrown and a military one takes place instead. This used to be a common situation in Central and South America until 1990s. It is important to retrieve some principles that can be found on the charter followed by the organization, “the Organization of American States has no powers other than those expressly conferred upon it by this Charter”, so at some point specially during the 1950s and 1960s, United States must find ways to negotiate and relate with this military governments which arose all over the region.
It is also important to considered some of the principles present on the charter that allows us to understand the posture presented by Dean Acheson in his speech, one of them is “to promote and consolidate representative democracy, with due respect for the principle of nonintervention”, another is how “international order consists essentially of respect for the personality, sovereignty, and independence of States, and the faithful fulfillment of obligations derived from treaties and other sources of international law”, so, according to these principles it can be said that the statement which best summarizes his quote is: The United States might recognize military rulers, but it does not necessarily support them.
Answer:
A. Internal coherence demonstrates how the parts of a hypothesis are coherent, or rationally connected.
B. Internal coherence is important because if a theory has internal inconsistencies, then its assumptions cannot all be correct.
C. Internal coherence demonstrates the rational relationship between parts of a hypothesis.
Explanation:
Internal coherence may be defined as a ability of the educators in the school or in a system to connect the resources and align them to carry an improvement strategy and also engaging them in collective learning. It also helps to use the learning to provide the students with a richer educational opportunities.
Internal Coherence is the extent to which a component ideas of any hypothesis are rationally connected.
The military fascism in Myanmar made the country's GDP stagnate. While its neighbors economy is a prospect, Myanmar monetary benefit just has a place with the hands of the military tip-top; widespread debasement was expanding. Notwithstanding rich normal assets, the economy stayed provincial with just a couple of individuals owning autos and electronic gadgets.
Answer:
answer:
Explanation:
Special Boat Teams.
plz mark as brainlist ......
