3 years ago

What about Wikipedia makes it an unreliable scholarly resource

2 answers:

5 0

It was able to receive peer editing from the general public. Such that, anyone could provide an answer without the proper sources. For example, give an unprofessional answer that may sound silly to a genuine question.

OLga [1]3 years ago

4 0

Wikipedia Is An Unreliable Source Because Anyone Can Edit Information At Any Time. This Means It Can Lead To False Facts.

You might be interested in

Elongated hyphens would make this sentence grammatically correct: Gideon and Francis took a difficult but not interesting scienc

lubasha [3.4K]

The answer would be the 3rd sentence.
<span>Gideon and Francis took a difficult - but not interesting - science course.</span>

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why does Walt Whitman use the word singing in the title “I Hear America Singing”?

slega [8]

The anser would be c mark me brainliest

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Question 4(Multiple Choice Worth 2 points)

Kaylis [27]

The rain inspired Carli to paint a picture of delicate roses, swirls of water, and jagged lighting bolts.

3 0

2 years ago

Which of the following is NOT an example of fiction?

kipiarov [429]

The answer is An encyclopedia

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The section “The Disease Hunter’s Toolbox” lists different types of equipment that infectious disease fighters need, everything

mojhsa [17]

Answer:

A.It takes a lot of different tools to fight disease.

B.Modern technology is an important part of the fight against disease.

D.Different types of scientists use different tools to fight disease.

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers