No es justo no mas porque el color de piel y no mas tratar los gringos justo y otros mas feos
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
Answer:
Authoritarian parents have may characteristics but we define here two characteristics:
- Authoritarian parents are not responsive but are more demanding from their children: These parents have may rules and regulations in their life. They manage things in a very little manner. These parents apply rules and regulations to their children in every aspect of lives, how they behave etc.
- These parents do not show much warmth and nurture to the children: These parents seem very cold and very harsh to the children. These types of parents always yelling at their children rather than encouraging them.
- little guidance from leaders
- leaders provide the tools and resources needed
- groups/ people in groups are expected to solve problems on their own
- complete freedom to make decisions
- power is given to the followers, but the leaders are responsible for the actions and decisions of the group
Hope this helps!
