As someone working on deliberative democracy and its practices, I think we should not exaggerate electoral accountability. Of course it is better than nothing however it is not an effective way of ensuring a democratic system. At the end of the day, we are talking about a power that can be used every 4 or 5 years. Such power is simply not powerful. The lack of citizen power in politics is a systemic issue. Unless the ideas and perspectives of citizens are transmitted to the political arena, we cannot talk about the power of people.
Education is crucially important. With better education people's voting preferences might have better bases. However, this does not make the system any more democratic than it is now unless people have more chances of effecting the policy making. This needs a better systemic environment than electoral politics. Here, I think deliberative and participatory models offer great ways of political decision-making.
<h3>hope it's help you </h3><h3>plz mark as brain list ........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</h3>
<span>It was Galileo Galili, an Italian
inventor/astronomer/mathematician who observed the solar system using a
telescope he invented. It was in 1610 that Galili concluded that the planets
orbit around the sun, not the earth. In the year 1632, he published his book “Dialogues on the Two Chief
Systems of the World” which brought his
world of science and humanism into a cosmic conflict with the world of
Scholasticism and absolutism (held power in the Catholic Church).</span>
On September 23, 1632, he was
summoned to Rome by the Inquisition and was put on trial. Following the judgment
of the Inquisition, he was forced to renounce his belief in Copernican Theory
and the earth’s motion. He was condemned to life imprisonment but was amended
to house arrest on the next day.
The aftermath is a tragedy. It marks
the end of both Galileo Galili’s freedom and end of the Italian Renaissance.
Answer:
B. oil-drilling equipment
Explanation:
Information down below:
False because the cartel have taken over
Answer:
All of the above.
Explanation:
The owners of the companies employed their own strategies. Sometimes if the company had enough supplies, they would <u>lockout</u> the workers. If they wanted to cut pay, they would tell the workers not to show up to work until they agreed to the cut. Often new employees were forced to sign contracts stating they would not join a union. Companies used many strategies to counter a strike. They would try to <u>hire</u> others, people called <u>scabs</u>, who would agree to work during a strike. The strikers would often use violence against these scabs.
