The question is asking to state the end result of Eukaryotic cell cycle, base on my research and further investigation, I would say that the correct answer would be that there is No parent cells and two daughter cells. I hope you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more
Answer:
No, when the concentration of carbon dioxide is high, such as in peripheral tissues, CO2 binds to hemoglobin and the affinity for O2 decreases, causing it to release.
Explanation:
The O2 molecule is reversibly combined with the heme portion of the hemoglobin. When the partial pressure of O2 is high, as in the case of pulmonary capillaries, for example, the binding of O2 to hemoglobin and the release of carbon dioxide are favored, this is known as the Haldane effect. If, on the contrary, when the concentration of carbon dioxide is high, such as in peripheral tissues, CO2 is bound to hemoglobin and the affinity for O2 decreases, causing it to release, this is known as the effect Bohr.
They will actually explode or burst
So What happens is the pure water outside has a high water potential while the cytoplasm inside the animal cell is a low water potential, water will diffuse down a water potential gradient through the semi-permeable membrane of the animal cell and cause the cell to swell (inflate like a fully-blown balloon), the result is that the delicate, elastic cell membrane<span> can't tolerate the internal pressure coming from the cytoplasm so it tears causing the cell to burst.</span><span>
</span>
Earth's mantle plays an important role in the evolution of the crust and provides the thermal and mechanical driving forces for plate tectonics. Heat liberated by the core is transferred into the mantle where most of it (> 90%) is convected through the mantle to the base of the lithosphere.
<h3><u>Answer;</u></h3>
Evaluate the validity and reliability of processes and findings.
<h3><u>Explanation</u>;</h3>
- <em><u>Scientific argumentation is a stage of scientific inquiry in which scientists make claims, based on observable evidence, and then clarify with justification of the evidence as relevant to the claims.</u></em>
- <em><u>It is therefore, an important part of scientific inquiry as it aims evaluate the validity and reliability of processes and findings. Scientific claims from an investigation should be based on evidence that is justified based on the claims.</u></em>