Answer:
cognitive view
Explanation:
Based on the information provided in regards to the situation at hand it can be said that this scenario is consistent with the cognitive view of psychology. This psychological perspective focuses on memory, problem solving, and language, and their processes in thinking and developing conclusions. Which is what is happening in this situation since you friends actions are making you process information in a certain way that is leading to specific conclusions.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
It's to subtract the smaller from the bigger
24
In addition to the conflict, interactionist, and functionalist perspectives, a fourth sociological perspective on racial and ethnic prejudice is known as: <u>feminist theory</u>.
There are four main sociological perspectives on racial and ethnic prejudice. They are symbolic interactionism theory, social conflict theory, structural-functional theory and feminist theory.
One of the main sociological theories, the Symbolic Interactionism Theory, is based on how our interpersonal interactions and communal experiences convey various symbols and meanings.
Social conflict theory explains the inequality of classes, how human conduct is divided into two classes—the higher or powerful class and the inferior class.
According to structural-functional theory, society is a complex, linked system in which every component contributes to the overall functionality of the system.
Feminism fights for gender equality because it sees men and women as typically being treated unfairly in society. It's a common misconception that feminist movements are led by a gang of enraged women who want to rule over males.
To learn more about racial and ethnic prejudice refer
brainly.com/question/2811665
#SPJ4
I trust many individuals are more intrigued to pseudoscience because of either religious or their inner beliefs (or a blend of both). A few people figure out how to influence that route, instead of the logical thinking and analysis if the pseudoscientific data runs forward with their confidence or thoughts. At times it goes to denying and ignoring the logical information, so dull as the pseudoscientific data runs forward with their standards, and the logical proof don't.Astrology is one thought that I am exclusively profound inside. I simply like the possibility of horoscopes and feel that my horoscope effectively discloses to me my character and considerably more. In view of the material this week it appears that astrology is a piece of pseudoscience as opposed to logical procedure frameworks. Another case would not meet right logical technique would be that confidence in pixies, sprites, and invented characters. I'm so wrong! I cherish the idea of creating these characters for my youngster and kids in my family. In spite of, the faith in these issues isn't deductively dependable. I've never viewed as about whether my conclusions in musings were deductively dependable or not.
