Answer:
![STC = 20K + 25L = 20*5 + 25*[\frac{Q^2}{25}] = 100 + Q^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20STC%20%3D%2020K%20%2B%2025L%20%3D%2020%2A5%20%2B%2025%2A%5B%5Cfrac%7BQ%5E2%7D%7B25%7D%5D%20%3D%20100%20%2B%20Q%5E2%20)
Explanation:
We are given:
K units of capital and L units of labor.
•Each unit of capital cost = 20
• Each unit of labor cost =25
• Level K is fixed at 5 units
We are told production function Q = K√L
Using the production functions and the values given, we can get that Q=5√L.
To find Q, the amount of labor will be given as:
Therefore, the Short run total cost function (STC) will be:
![20K + 25L = 20*5 + 25[\frac{Q^2}{25}] = 100 + Q^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%2020K%20%2B%2025L%20%3D%2020%2A5%20%2B%2025%5B%5Cfrac%7BQ%5E2%7D%7B25%7D%5D%20%3D%20100%20%2B%20Q%5E2%20)
Answer:
An contract is an understanding agreement that can be implemented in court it is a shaped by two or more gatherings who consent to perform or to cease from playing out some demonstration now or later on . The target hypothesis of agreements not by the individual or subjective aim or conviction of a gathering .The hypothesis is that gathering's expectation to go into an agreement is judged by outward destinations truths as deciphered by a sensible individual ,as opposed to by the gathering's mystery subjective aims . the essential components of a substantial contract and the path in which an agreement is made. The agreements that fall under this circumstance would be the agreement of arrangement contract of development ,contract of execution and the agreement of enforceability. The main contract would be the agreement of arrangement .They are contracts that are grouped in light of how when an agreement of development .
In the event that Ed had constantly paid for all the earlier pieces of candy, there gives off an impression of being suggested in actuality contract taking into account the earlier course of dealings amongst Ed and Fran.
Waving the sweet treat at Fran can be seen as an affirmation that Ed was not surreptitiously taking the piece of candy, but rather was demonstrating that he would get her the cash for that one later. His questionable signal in light of the gatherings earlier course of managing could sensibly be translated by Fran as a nonverbal IOU at the cost of that 1 piece of candy.There can likewise be an inferred in law contract taking into account the same certainties since to not force a suggested in law guarantee to pay results in the uncalled for improvement of Ed at the expense of Fran.Either sort of inferred contract is enforceable in Court.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
A statement of the basic purpose that makes the organization different from others.
Answer:
c. 97.558%
Explanation:
Options are <em>"A. 50.0.% B. 2.442% C. 97.558% D.197.0% E. 47,442%"</em>
Mean = μ = 1447
Standard deviation = σ = 715
Observed value = X = 2855
Using z-score formula, Z = (X - μ) / σ
Z = (2855 - 1447) / 715
Z = 1.97
P(Z<1.97) = 0.97558
P(Z<1.97) = 97.558%
So, the probability of a stock-out is 97.558%.
Answer:
B. shifts the individual's budget line rightward because she can now purchase more of both products
Explanation:
When there is an increase in the budget line of a consumer, it means that there is an expansion in this consumers consumption possibilities.
The consumers budget line will then shift rightward or upwards. With this increase the consumer can purchase more of both goods. The outward shift indicates increase.
Therefore the answer to the question is option B.
