Answer:
Two Weeks
Explanation:
Major Depressive Disorder or simply Depression is a serious mental disorder characterised by periods of low, sunken moods, withdrawal and lack of interest in everyday activities like talking, eating, socializing.
The will to stay alive begins to gradually ebb as the victim is no longer interested in life and begins to withdraw from people.
The victim may also start hallucinating by seeing or hearing things that do not exist.
However for a person to be confirmed as depressed, the symptoms must have lasted for a minimum period of two weeks
Answer: B. The horrors of the Holocaust have been exaggerated or were isolated incidents.
According to the <em>International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, d</em>istortion of the Holocaust includes especially the following:
- <em>Intentional efforts to excuse or minimize the impact of the Holocaust or its principal elements, including collaborators and allies of Nazi Germany;</em>
- <em>Gross minimization of the number of the victims of the Holocaust in contradiction to reliable sources;</em>
- <em>Attempts to blame the Jews for causing their own genocide ...</em>
- <em>Attempts to blur the responsibility for the establishment of concentration and death camps devised and operated by Nazi Germany by putting blame on other nations or ethnic groups.</em>
Answer:
No
Explanation:
After it is vetoed it will go back to the senates who wanted the law and they will think about it again, then they will send it back and see if its approved or vetoed.
Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.
In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.
In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.
Economic issues in many countries: Greece and Turkey in particular were struggling and the US and USSR as positioning for control.
In the aftermath of WWII, many countries in Europe were left economically devastated. The US employed the Marshall Plan to fund and secure the economies of many countries including Greece (shown on the map). Stalin was next to make a move to secure countries under his influence.
