1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Delvig [45]
3 years ago
5

What IF Mary Musgrove refused to translate for Tomochichi and Oglethorpe?What Would Happen

History
1 answer:
IgorC [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The colony of Georgia would not have been founded.

Explanation:

The colony of Georgia officially founded on February 12, 1733. Georgia was a debtor’s colony where English debtors are given a chance to start a new life in the colony by cultivation. Mercantilism was a factor in the establishment of the colony of Georgia. The colonists of Georgia is able to produce agricultural products like Rice, indigo and tobacco desired in England.

The link between Tomochichi,  Mary Musgrove, and Oglethorpe crucial to the expansion of the city of Savannah at Yamacraw Bluff. Without land gifted from Tomochichi to Oglethorpe, the colony’s location would have been elsewhere. Musgrove used her language skills to a land agreement and maintain peace between the British and Native Americans. Oglethorpe provided protection to the Yamacraw tribes and trade opportunities.

You might be interested in
The arms race was
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

The third one ( or C idk)

Explanation:

That crisis made the fear of a atomic war more real than everthing at the time, and showed to everyone that the thing could go nuclear at any time because the tensions between the countries

4 0
3 years ago
How and why were the Gracchi brothers killed?​
NARA [144]
The explanation to your question is in the photo. Hope this helps ^^

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following phrases best describes the U.S. population?
IRISSAK [1]
People do not act their age.
8 0
3 years ago
Does Lewis think that JFK has been supportive of the civil rights movement?
Serhud [2]
I'm going to suppose that your reference point is the "We Must Free Ourselves" speech given by John Lewis in 1963 at the March on Washington.  The simple answer to the question is that Lewis did not think President Kennedy and the federal government had given genuine support to the civil rights movement.  Lewis was even forced by the Kennedy administration to edit his speech because the initial draft was so strongly critical of the administration.  Let me quote you a section from the draft of the speech that Lewis was pressured to drop before actually giving the speech.

Mr. Kennedy is trying to take the revolution out of the street and put it in the courts.  Listen, Mr. Kennedy, listen, Mr. congressman, listen fellow citizens, the black masses are on the march for jobs and freedom, and we must say to the politicians that there won’t be a “cooling-off” period.  <span>We won’t stop now.
</span>
In the speech which Lewis did give, he pointed criticism at JFK in a less direct way, saying that the party of Kennedy was the also the party of Eastland.  James Eastland was a Democratic senator from Mississippi who was staunchly opposed to the civil rights movement. 

John Lewis called on black citizens to stand up for their own rights, because the political leaders could not (and some would not) do so for them.  


7 0
4 years ago
Which statements are true about the magna Carta
almond37 [142]

Answer:

3. The Magna Carta guaranteed that the king could not impose new taxes without permission from a council.

1. English barons and church leaders wrote the Magna Carta because they could no longer tolerate King John's abuses of their traditional rights.

Another way to rephrase the first one is;

Among the many restrictions placed upon the King by the Nobles was the idea that the king could not impose taxes without the approval of the “common counsel” of the Kingdom:

Another way to rephrase the second one is;

The committee of Twenty Five were a group of barons in the forefront of the opposition to King John who were entrusted by the terms of clause 61 of Magna Carta to ensure the king’s compliance with its terms.

The church clergy that helped were Cathedral churches in Salisbury and Lincoln.

Explanation:

Justice

King John’s father, Henry II (r. 1154–89), introduced extensive judicial reforms, established the authority of the royal courts and laid firm foundations for the future system of justice in England. In contrast, John regularly abused the justice system to suppress his opponents and to extort revenue from the barons. The justice system and feudal law were two of the main themes addressed in Magna Carta, and the most famous clause dealt with justice:

No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land.

The barons ensured that numerous other clauses in Magna Carta defined in more detail how the justice system and its officials were to operate. These clauses sought to remedy specific abuses by the king and to make the system more consistent, accessible and fair.

Magna Carta and peace

Many of the clauses towards the end of Magna Carta were practical arrangements for making peace. Rather than looking forward to how the king was to behave in the future, these clauses sought to put right the wrongs done by King John.

The king was immediately to return all hostages, to remove all foreign knights and mercenaries from England, to remit all fines exacted unjustly, and to restore lands, castles and liberties to all who had been wrongfully deprived of them. These clauses were not statements of legal principle, but they were a part of the peace-making process.

All the others are not true as King John had no choice at all.

Perhaps the most radical clause in Magna Carta was the 61st, which set up an elected commission of 25 barons to monitor the king’s compliance with the settlement and to enforce its terms. The 25 barons had the power to seize the king’s property in order to seek redress if he failed to keep the terms imposed on him. This innovative clause demonstrated the power invested in Magna Carta to limit royal authority

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • the policy of popular sovereignty brought about fierce competition between the anti and pro slavery forces Kansas territory the
    11·2 answers
  • When did slavery in Africa begin
    11·1 answer
  • What were the only two times Japan was ever successfully invaded by a foreign power? Okinawa Guam Iwo Jima Saipan
    5·1 answer
  • The fact that there was no national military was a weakness in which area of government?
    5·1 answer
  • Which new method used to manufacture steel in the late 1800s had a huge impact on the US because this method allowed for steel t
    10·1 answer
  • How did Ronald Reagan shift the meaning of freedom during his presidency?
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASEEEE ANSWERRRRR
    11·1 answer
  • HELP GUYS!!
    15·2 answers
  • If you could make 1 rule that<br> everyone in the world had to<br> follow, what would it be?
    13·2 answers
  • True or false? The depression allowed for the rise of dictatorial leaders who promised they would heal all of their nations' woe
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!